:::
TEDS Table of Project lists >
TEDS2020 >
The Survey of the Presidential and Legislative Elections, 2020 (TEDS2020)
Classification Questionnaire :
1. During the presidential election campaign, many different problems faced by our country were raised What do you think is the most important political problem facing Taiwan today?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
1 | Economic development | 364 | 21.7% | |
2 | Cross-strait problem | 415 | 24.7% | |
3 | National identity | 14 | 0.8% | |
4 | Alternation of power | 0 | 0% | |
5 | Political stability | 17 | 1.0% | |
6 | Diplomatic and international status issues | 51 | 3.0% | |
7 | Judicial reform issues | 16 | 0.9% | |
8 | Educational reform | 23 | 1.4% | |
9 | Environmental protection | 9 | 0.5% | |
10 | Gap between the rich and the poor | 8 | 0.5% | |
11 | Unemployment issues | 5 | 0.3% | |
12 | Aboriginal issues | 0 | 0% | |
13 | Social welfare | 28 | 1.7% | |
14 | Living justice | 3 | 0.2% | |
15 | Military apartments | 0 | 0% | |
16 | Land spectulating | 0 | 0% | |
17 | Tzuyu apologized for waving the ROC national flag | 0 | 0% | |
18 | Sunflower Student Movement | 0 | 0% | |
19 | Low starting wage | 0 | 0% | |
20 | Clean politics | 6 | 0.4% | |
21 | Constitution reform | 2 | 0.1% | |
22 | Food safety | 0 | 0% | |
23 | Youth employment | 5 | 0.3% | |
24 | 1992 Consensus | 9 | 0.5% | |
25 | President's leadership ability | 1 | 0.1% | |
26 | Party assets | 0 | 0% | |
27 | Pension reform issues | 24 | 1.4% | |
28 | Taiwanese Solidarity | 1 | 0.1% | |
29 | Clear away notorious partisan conflicts | 12 | 0.7% | |
30 | KMT candidate replacement | 0 | 0% | |
31 | Labor issues | 16 | 0.9% | |
32 | Comfort women issue | 0 | 0% | |
33 | people's livelihood | 18 | 1.1% | |
34 | Social stability | 9 | 0.5% | |
35 | sovereignty problem | 88 | 5.2% | |
36 | Distribution justice | 2 | 0.1% | |
37 | Crime | 9 | 0.5% | |
38 | Local resource allocation | 1 | 0.1% | |
39 | Ethnic cleavage | 8 | 0.5% | |
40 | Legislative process issues | 0 | 0% | |
41 | Ability of government executive | 3 | 0.2% | |
42 | Issues manipulation | 0 | 0% | |
43 | Ethnic Fusion | 4 | 0.2% | |
44 | Political attribution | 0 | 0% | |
45 | International status | 19 | 1.1% | |
46 | National internal struggle | 3 | 0.2% | |
47 | One-party dominance | 1 | 0.1% | |
48 | Communicate between government and the public | 3 | 0.2% | |
49 | Rulers' low Democratic literacy | 0 | 0% | |
51 | KMT inability | 0 | 0% | |
52 | Appointment | 1 | 0.1% | |
53 | Renewable energy | 6 | 0.4% | |
54 | Boycott KMT | 0 | 0% | |
55 | Quality of life | 1 | 0.1% | |
57 | Individualism | 0 | 0% | |
58 | Quality of bureaucracy | 0 | 0% | |
59 | International trade and economic exchange | 1 | 0.1% | |
60 | Citizen engagement | 2 | 0.1% | |
61 | Interpersonal trust | 0 | 0% | |
62 | Medical system | 0 | 0% | |
63 | Freedom of speech | 1 | 0.1% | |
64 | Safe nuclear power | 7 | 0.4% | |
65 | Clean politics | 10 | 0.6% | |
66 | Finacial issues | 4 | 0.2% | |
67 | Generational alternation | 1 | 0.1% | |
68 | Against the extradition bill in Hong Kong | 28 | 1.7% | |
69 | Defending democracy and freedom | 11 | 0.7% | |
70 | National Defense Policy | 10 | 0.6% | |
71 | fake news | 8 | 0.5% | |
72 | The ruling party performs poorly | 1 | 0.1% | |
73 | Marriage Equality | 47 | 2.8% | |
74 | Taiwan's future development route | 3 | 0.2% | |
75 | Reverse osmosis | 17 | 1.0% | |
76 | Integrity of Political Figures | 3 | 0.2% | |
77 | National Security | 2 | 0.1% | |
78 | Transitional Justice | 1 | 0.1% | |
79 | country positioning | 7 | 0.4% | |
992 | None | 66 | 3.9% | |
995 | Refuse to answer | 14 | 0.8% | |
998 | Don't know | 231 | 13.8% | |
Frequency : | 1680 | 100% |
2. Which presidential candidate do you think is most capable of dealing with it?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
1 | James C. Y. Soong and Yu, Hsiang | 129 | 7.7% | |
2 | Daniel K. Y. Han and Simon S. C. Chang | 252 | 15.0% | |
3 | Tsai, Ing-Wen and Lai, Ching-Te | 666 | 39.6% | |
91 | All of them | 22 | 1.3% | |
92 | None of them | 224 | 13.3% | |
95 | Refuse to answer | 10 | 0.6% | |
97 | No opinion | 6 | 0.4% | |
98 | Don't know | 60 | 3.6% | |
99 | Skipped | 311 | 18.5% | |
Frequency : | 1680 | 100% |
3. What would you rate James C. Y. Soong?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
0 | Strongly dislike | 171 | 10.2% | |
1 | 72 | 4.3% | ||
2 | 92 | 5.5% | ||
3 | 186 | 11.1% | ||
4 | 110 | 6.6% | ||
5 | 506 | 30.1% | ||
6 | 173 | 10.3% | ||
7 | 133 | 7.9% | ||
8 | 114 | 6.8% | ||
9 | 10 | 0.6% | ||
10 | Strongly like | 38 | 2.3% | |
95 | Refuse to answer | 12 | 0.7% | |
96 | It's hard to say | 9 | 0.5% | |
97 | No opinion | 12 | 0.7% | |
98 | Don't know | 42 | 2.5% | |
Frequency : | 1680 | 100% |
4. What would you rate Daniel K. Y. Han?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
0 | Strongly dislike | 525 | 31.2% | |
1 | 128 | 7.6% | ||
2 | 113 | 6.7% | ||
3 | 158 | 9.4% | ||
4 | 82 | 4.9% | ||
5 | 206 | 12.3% | ||
6 | 100 | 5.9% | ||
7 | 78 | 4.6% | ||
8 | 104 | 6.2% | ||
9 | 49 | 2.9% | ||
10 | Strongly like | 75 | 4.5% | |
95 | Refuse to answer | 13 | 0.8% | |
96 | It's hard to say | 8 | 0.5% | |
97 | No opinion | 10 | 0.6% | |
98 | Don't know | 31 | 1.8% | |
Frequency : | 1680 | 100% |
5. What would you rate Tsai, Ing-Wen?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
0 | Strongly dislike | 108 | 6.4% | |
1 | 38 | 2.3% | ||
2 | 59 | 3.5% | ||
3 | 96 | 5.7% | ||
4 | 82 | 4.9% | ||
5 | 250 | 14.9% | ||
6 | 148 | 8.8% | ||
7 | 199 | 11.8% | ||
8 | 296 | 17.6% | ||
9 | 156 | 9.3% | ||
10 | Strongly like | 203 | 12.1% | |
95 | Refuse to answer | 12 | 0.7% | |
96 | It's hard to say | 5 | 0.3% | |
97 | No opinion | 5 | 0.3% | |
98 | Don't know | 23 | 1.4% | |
Frequency : | 1680 | 100% |
6. What would you rate James C. Y. Soong?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
0 | Capability is very poor | 96 | 5.7% | |
1 | 35 | 2.1% | ||
2 | 84 | 5.0% | ||
3 | 155 | 9.2% | ||
4 | 119 | 7.1% | ||
5 | 428 | 25.5% | ||
6 | 206 | 12.3% | ||
7 | 192 | 11.4% | ||
8 | 163 | 9.7% | ||
9 | 47 | 2.8% | ||
10 | Capability is very good | 54 | 3.2% | |
95 | Refuse to answer | 14 | 0.8% | |
96 | It's hard to say | 12 | 0.7% | |
97 | No opinion | 10 | 0.6% | |
98 | Don't know | 65 | 3.9% | |
Frequency : | 1680 | 100% |
7. What would you rate Daniel K. Y. Han?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
0 | Capability is very poor | 426 | 25.4% | |
1 | 153 | 9.1% | ||
2 | 136 | 8.1% | ||
3 | 173 | 10.3% | ||
4 | 101 | 6.0% | ||
5 | 214 | 12.7% | ||
6 | 101 | 6.0% | ||
7 | 98 | 5.8% | ||
8 | 104 | 6.2% | ||
9 | 41 | 2.4% | ||
10 | Capability is very good | 59 | 3.5% | |
95 | Refuse to answer | 13 | 0.8% | |
96 | It's hard to say | 8 | 0.5% | |
97 | No opinion | 8 | 0.5% | |
98 | Don't know | 45 | 2.7% | |
Frequency : | 1680 | 100% |
8. What would you rate Tsai, Ing-Wen?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
0 | Capability is very poor | 66 | 3.9% | |
1 | 32 | 1.9% | ||
2 | 49 | 2.9% | ||
3 | 76 | 4.5% | ||
4 | 69 | 4.1% | ||
5 | 256 | 15.2% | ||
6 | 204 | 12.1% | ||
7 | 242 | 14.4% | ||
8 | 303 | 18.0% | ||
9 | 160 | 9.5% | ||
10 | Capability is very good | 167 | 9.9% | |
95 | Refuse to answer | 14 | 0.8% | |
96 | It's hard to say | 7 | 0.4% | |
97 | No opinion | 7 | 0.4% | |
98 | Don't know | 28 | 1.7% | |
Frequency : | 1680 | 100% |
9. What would you rate James C. Y. Soong?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
0 | Does not understand at all | 101 | 6.0% | |
1 | 35 | 2.1% | ||
2 | 87 | 5.2% | ||
3 | 192 | 11.4% | ||
4 | 114 | 6.8% | ||
5 | 378 | 22.5% | ||
6 | 215 | 12.8% | ||
7 | 165 | 9.8% | ||
8 | 178 | 10.6% | ||
9 | 41 | 2.4% | ||
10 | Completely understands | 48 | 2.9% | |
95 | Refuse to answer | 14 | 0.8% | |
96 | It's hard to say | 10 | 0.6% | |
97 | No opinion | 12 | 0.7% | |
98 | Don't know | 90 | 5.4% | |
Frequency : | 1680 | 100% |
10. What would you rate Daniel K. Y. Han?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
0 | Does not understand at all | 320 | 19.1% | |
1 | 118 | 7.0% | ||
2 | 139 | 8.3% | ||
3 | 175 | 10.4% | ||
4 | 100 | 5.9% | ||
5 | 240 | 14.3% | ||
6 | 115 | 6.9% | ||
7 | 128 | 7.6% | ||
8 | 122 | 7.3% | ||
9 | 59 | 3.5% | ||
10 | Completely understands | 64 | 3.8% | |
95 | Refuse to answer | 14 | 0.8% | |
96 | It's hard to say | 12 | 0.7% | |
97 | No opinion | 9 | 0.5% | |
98 | Don't know | 65 | 3.9% | |
Frequency : | 1680 | 100% |
11. What would you rate Tsai, Ing-Wen?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
0 | Does not understand at all | 56 | 3.3% | |
1 | 34 | 2.0% | ||
2 | 62 | 3.7% | ||
3 | 92 | 5.5% | ||
4 | 76 | 4.5% | ||
5 | 278 | 16.6% | ||
6 | 210 | 12.5% | ||
7 | 241 | 14.3% | ||
8 | 263 | 15.7% | ||
9 | 139 | 8.3% | ||
10 | Completely understands | 150 | 8.9% | |
95 | Refuse to answer | 14 | 0.8% | |
96 | It's hard to say | 8 | 0.5% | |
97 | No opinion | 5 | 0.3% | |
98 | Don't know | 52 | 3.1% | |
Frequency : | 1680 | 100% |
12. What would you rate James C. Y. Soong?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
0 | Completely incapable | 109 | 6.5% | |
1 | 30 | 1.8% | ||
2 | 103 | 6.1% | ||
3 | 210 | 12.5% | ||
4 | 131 | 7.8% | ||
5 | 418 | 24.9% | ||
6 | 222 | 13.2% | ||
7 | 162 | 9.6% | ||
8 | 119 | 7.1% | ||
9 | 29 | 1.7% | ||
10 | Completely able | 32 | 1.9% | |
95 | Refuse to answer | 15 | 0.9% | |
96 | It's hard to say | 14 | 0.8% | |
97 | No opinion | 10 | 0.6% | |
98 | Don't know | 76 | 4.5% | |
Frequency : | 1680 | 100% |
13. What would you rate Daniel K. Y. Han?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
0 | Completely incapable | 421 | 25.1% | |
1 | 126 | 7.5% | ||
2 | 129 | 7.7% | ||
3 | 146 | 8.7% | ||
4 | 90 | 5.4% | ||
5 | 238 | 14.2% | ||
6 | 124 | 7.4% | ||
7 | 95 | 5.7% | ||
8 | 112 | 6.7% | ||
9 | 49 | 2.9% | ||
10 | Completely able | 55 | 3.3% | |
95 | Refuse to answer | 16 | 0.9% | |
96 | It's hard to say | 12 | 0.7% | |
97 | No opinion | 9 | 0.5% | |
98 | Don't know | 58 | 3.5% | |
Frequency : | 1680 | 100% |
14. What would you rate Tsai, Ing-Wen?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
0 | Completely incapable | 54 | 3.2% | |
1 | 38 | 2.3% | ||
2 | 57 | 3.4% | ||
3 | 75 | 4.5% | ||
4 | 65 | 3.9% | ||
5 | 246 | 14.6% | ||
6 | 173 | 10.3% | ||
7 | 209 | 12.4% | ||
8 | 292 | 17.4% | ||
9 | 162 | 9.6% | ||
10 | Completely able | 227 | 13.5% | |
95 | Refuse to answer | 16 | 0.9% | |
96 | It's hard to say | 11 | 0.7% | |
97 | No opinion | 8 | 0.5% | |
98 | Don't know | 47 | 2.8% | |
Frequency : | 1680 | 100% |
15. What would you rate James C. Y. Soong?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
0 | Completely incapable | 102 | 6.1% | |
1 | 28 | 1.7% | ||
2 | 74 | 4.4% | ||
3 | 137 | 8.2% | ||
4 | 96 | 5.7% | ||
5 | 461 | 27.4% | ||
6 | 204 | 12.1% | ||
7 | 197 | 11.7% | ||
8 | 152 | 9.0% | ||
9 | 48 | 2.9% | ||
10 | Completely able | 53 | 3.1% | |
95 | Refuse to answer | 20 | 1.2% | |
96 | It's hard to say | 27 | 1.6% | |
97 | No opinion | 11 | 0.7% | |
98 | Don't know | 70 | 4.2% | |
Frequency : | 1680 | 100% |
16. What would you rate Daniel K. Y. Han?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
0 | Completely incapable | 310 | 18.4% | |
1 | 80 | 4.8% | ||
2 | 97 | 5.8% | ||
3 | 122 | 7.3% | ||
4 | 104 | 6.2% | ||
5 | 255 | 15.2% | ||
6 | 140 | 8.3% | ||
7 | 134 | 8.0% | ||
8 | 169 | 10.1% | ||
9 | 65 | 3.9% | ||
10 | Completely able | 91 | 5.4% | |
95 | Refuse to answer | 20 | 1.2% | |
96 | It's hard to say | 21 | 1.2% | |
97 | No opinion | 10 | 0.6% | |
98 | Don't know | 62 | 3.7% | |
Frequency : | 1680 | 100% |
17. What would you rate Tsai, Ing-Wen?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
0 | Completely incapable | 116 | 6.9% | |
1 | 54 | 3.2% | ||
2 | 75 | 4.5% | ||
3 | 129 | 7.7% | ||
4 | 85 | 5.1% | ||
5 | 343 | 20.4% | ||
6 | 172 | 10.2% | ||
7 | 189 | 11.2% | ||
8 | 173 | 10.3% | ||
9 | 113 | 6.7% | ||
10 | Completely able | 133 | 7.9% | |
95 | Refuse to answer | 16 | 0.9% | |
96 | It's hard to say | 22 | 1.3% | |
97 | No opinion | 10 | 0.6% | |
98 | Don't know | 50 | 3.0% | |
Frequency : | 1680 | 100% |
18. Some people think the wage of the salaried class is low. Which candidate do you think have more ability to solve the problem of low income?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
1 | James C. Y. Soong and Yu, Hsiang | 111 | 6.6% | |
2 | Daniel K. Y. Han and Simon S. C. Chang | 332 | 19.8% | |
3 | Tsai, Ing-Wen and Lai, Ching-Te | 670 | 39.9% | |
4 | There isn't any problem of low income | 82 | 4.9% | |
91 | All of them | 14 | 0.8% | |
92 | None of them | 297 | 17.7% | |
95 | Refuse to answer | 14 | 0.8% | |
97 | No opinion | 30 | 1.8% | |
98 | Don't know | 130 | 7.7% | |
99 | Skipped | 0 | 0% | |
Frequency : | 1680 | 100% |
19. How serious do you think about Taiwan's losing diplomatic ties?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
1 | Very serious | 493 | 29.3% | |
2 | Serious | 573 | 34.1% | |
3 | Not very serious | 350 | 20.8% | |
4 | Not serious at all | 40 | 2.4% | |
5 | It's doesn't matter | 155 | 9.2% | |
95 | Refuse to answer | 4 | 0.2% | |
96 | It depends | 3 | 0.2% | |
97 | No opinion | 3 | 0.2% | |
98 | Don't know | 59 | 3.5% | |
Frequency : | 1680 | 100% |
20. Which presidential candidate do you think is most capable of solving the problem of losing diplomatic ties?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
1 | James C. Y. Soong and Yu, Hsiang | 294 | 17.5% | |
2 | Daniel K. Y. Han and Simon S. C. Chang | 368 | 21.9% | |
3 | Tsai, Ing-Wen and Lai, Ching-Te | 456 | 27.1% | |
91 | All of them | 14 | 0.8% | |
92 | None of them | 313 | 18.6% | |
95 | Refuse to answer | 15 | 0.9% | |
97 | No opinion | 44 | 2.6% | |
98 | Don't know | 176 | 10.5% | |
99 | Skipped | 0 | 0% | |
Frequency : | 1680 | 100% |
21. In terms of Taiwan's relations with the United States, which direction do you think Taiwan should move in the future?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
-5 | Stands for keeping distance as much as possible | 32 | 2.9% | |
0 | maintaining the status quo | 585 | 53.7% | |
5 | Stands for trying hard to build a close tie | 413 | 37.9% | |
95 | Refuse to answer | 2 | 0.2% | |
96 | It's hard to say | 8 | 0.7% | |
97 | No opinion | 3 | 0.3% | |
98 | Don't know | 47 | 4.3% | |
Frequency : | 1090 | 100% |
22. In terms of Taiwan's relations with China, which direction do you think Taiwan should move in the future?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
-5 | Stands for keeping distance as much as possible | 225 | 19.6% | |
0 | maintaining the status quo | 708 | 61.8% | |
5 | Stands for trying hard to build a close tie | 146 | 12.7% | |
95 | Refuse to answer | 3 | 0.3% | |
96 | It's hard to say | 13 | 1.1% | |
97 | No opinion | 5 | 0.4% | |
98 | Don't know | 46 | 4.0% | |
Frequency : | 1146 | 100% |
23. What do you think about the protests in Hong Kong?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
1 | that as Hong Kong people's fight for democracy | 1201 | 71.5% | |
2 | that as a violation of social order | 310 | 18.4% | |
95 | Refuse to answer | 13 | 0.8% | |
96 | It's hard to say | 64 | 3.8% | |
97 | No opinion | 12 | 0.7% | |
98 | Don't know | 80 | 4.8% | |
Frequency : | 1680 | 100% |
24. On May 17th last year, the Legislative Yuan passed the same-sex marriage law (Enforcement Act of Judicial Yuan Interpretation No. 748, Same-Sex Marriage). Do you support this legislation?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
1 | Strongly support | 187 | 11.1% | |
2 | Support | 502 | 29.9% | |
3 | Not support | 462 | 27.5% | |
4 | Not support at all | 447 | 26.6% | |
95 | Refuse to answer | 5 | 0.3% | |
96 | It's hard to say | 16 | 0.9% | |
97 | No opinion | 45 | 2.7% | |
98 | Don't know | 16 | 0.9% | |
Frequency : | 1680 | 100% |
25. The government uses thermal power, wind power and solar energy to replace nuclear power plant. Do you agree or disagree with this energy policy?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
1 | Strongly agree | 139 | 8.3% | |
2 | Agree | 787 | 46.9% | |
3 | Disagree | 435 | 25.9% | |
4 | Strongly disagree | 176 | 10.5% | |
95 | Refuse to answer | 11 | 0.7% | |
96 | It's hard to say | 35 | 2.1% | |
97 | No opinion | 21 | 1.2% | |
98 | Don't know | 76 | 4.5% | |
Frequency : | 1680 | 100% |
26. The annuity reform had become effective since July, 2018. How satisfied are you with the performance of the government so far on the annuity reform?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
1 | Very satisfied | 314 | 18.7% | |
2 | Satisfied | 661 | 39.4% | |
3 | Not very satisfied | 399 | 23.8% | |
4 | Not satisfied at all | 148 | 8.8% | |
95 | Refuse to answer | 7 | 0.4% | |
96 | It's hard to say | 11 | 0.7% | |
97 | No opinion | 47 | 2.8% | |
98 | Don't know | 93 | 5.5% | |
Frequency : | 1680 | 100% |
27. How satisfied are you with the policy of 'One fixed day off and one flexible rest day?'
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
1 | Very satisfied | 100 | 5.9% | |
2 | Satisfied | 567 | 33.8% | |
3 | Not very satisfied | 629 | 37.4% | |
4 | Not satisfied at all | 182 | 10.8% | |
95 | Refuse to answer | 6 | 0.4% | |
96 | It's hard to say | 14 | 0.8% | |
97 | No opinion | 59 | 3.5% | |
98 | Don't know | 123 | 7.3% | |
Frequency : | 1680 | 100% |
28. Has any candidate ever made you feel angry?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
1 | James C. Y. Soong | 76 | 4.5% | |
2 | Daniel K. Y. Han | 969 | 57.7% | |
3 | Tsai, Ing-Wen | 315 | 18.8% | |
91 | All of them | 14 | 0.8% | |
92 | None of them | 208 | 12.4% | |
95 | Refuse to answer | 35 | 2.1% | |
97 | No opinion | 0 | 0% | |
98 | Don't know | 63 | 3.8% | |
Frequency : | 1680 | 100% |
29. Has any candidate ever made you feel afraid?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
1 | James C. Y. Soong | 153 | 9.1% | |
2 | Daniel K. Y. Han | 985 | 58.6% | |
3 | Tsai, Ing-Wen | 297 | 17.7% | |
91 | All of them | 24 | 1.4% | |
92 | None of them | 117 | 7.0% | |
95 | Refuse to answer | 31 | 1.8% | |
97 | No opinion | 0 | 0% | |
98 | Don't know | 73 | 4.3% | |
Frequency : | 1680 | 100% |
30. Has any candidate ever made you feel hopeful?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
1 | James C. Y. Soong | 134 | 8.0% | |
2 | Daniel K. Y. Han | 295 | 17.6% | |
3 | Tsai, Ing-Wen | 845 | 50.3% | |
91 | All of them | 23 | 1.4% | |
92 | None of them | 274 | 16.3% | |
95 | Refuse to answer | 28 | 1.7% | |
97 | No opinion | 0 | 0% | |
98 | Don't know | 81 | 4.8% | |
Frequency : | 1680 | 100% |
31. Has any candidate ever made you feel proud to be a Taiwanese?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
1 | James C. Y. Soong | 97 | 5.8% | |
2 | Daniel K. Y. Han | 243 | 14.5% | |
3 | Tsai, Ing-Wen | 873 | 52.0% | |
91 | All of them | 17 | 1.0% | |
92 | None of them | 339 | 20.2% | |
95 | Refuse to answer | 30 | 1.8% | |
97 | No opinion | 0 | 0% | |
98 | Don't know | 81 | 4.8% | |
Frequency : | 1680 | 100% |