:::
TEDS Table of Project lists >
TEDS2005M >
The Survey of Yunlin County Magistrate/City Mayoral Elections in 2005 (Independence)
1. E01 In last year's election many people went to vote, while others, for various reasons, did not go to vote. Did you vote?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 1 | yes | 576 | 87.1% | |
| 2 | no | 79 | 11.9% | |
| 90 | omit | 0 | 0% | |
| 91 | forgot | 4 | 0.6% | |
| 95 | refuse to answer | 2 | 0.3% | |
| Frequency : | 661 | 100% | ||
2. E1A What was the reason you didn't vote?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 1 | leave home town | 12 | 1.8% | |
| 2 | lack ideal candidate | 6 | 0.9% | |
| 3 | difficult to choose | 0 | 0% | |
| 4 | voting for anyone has no difference | 0 | 0% | |
| 5 | working | 21 | 3.2% | |
| 6 | have no time | 6 | 0.9% | |
| 7 | can't change the electoral outcome | 0 | 0% | |
| 8 | don't want to vote(have no interest) | 8 | 1.2% | |
| 9 | don't vote for the legislator but vote for the county magistrar | 0 | 0% | |
| 10 | forgot to vote | 0 | 0% | |
| 11 | the census register is in the municipality directly under the jurisdiction of the Central Government | 1 | 0.1% | |
| 12 | have no confidence in the country | 0 | 0% | |
| 13 | have no voting right | 1 | 0.1% | |
| 14 | identification card(stamp, voting notification) is disappeared | 1 | 0.1% | |
| 15 | staff of voting affairs | 3 | 0.4% | |
| 16 | military service | 1 | 0.1% | |
| 17 | get ill(mental factors) | 6 | 0.9% | |
| 18 | fearful of bribery | 0 | 0% | |
| 19 | the election is unimportant and meaningless | 2 | 0.3% | |
| 20 | disappointed about politics | 4 | 0.6% | |
| 21 | the weather is too cold | 0 | 0% | |
| 22 | don't understand the candidates' qualities | 0 | 0% | |
| 23 | re-registering for residence didn't live up to six months | 1 | 0.1% | |
| 24 | don't understand the election | 0 | 0% | |
| 25 | war of words | 0 | 0% | |
| 26 | never voted before | 0 | 0% | |
| 27 | oversleep | 0 | 0% | |
| 28 | serve a sentence | 1 | 0.1% | |
| 29 | illiteracy | 1 | 0.1% | |
| 30 | marriage | 0 | 0% | |
| 90 | omit | 1 | 0.1% | |
| 95 | refuse to answer | 4 | 0.6% | |
| 99 | skip | 581 | 87.9% | |
| Frequency : | 661 | 100% | ||
3. E2A Which candidate did you vote for in Yunlin County Magistrate Election?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 1 | Lin,Jia-Yu | 1 | 0.1% | |
| 2 | Syu,Shu-Bo | 119 | 18.0% | |
| 3 | Su,Jhih-Fen | 268 | 40.5% | |
| 90 | omit | 0 | 0% | |
| 91 | forgot | 45 | 6.8% | |
| 92 | invalid vote | 6 | 0.9% | |
| 95 | refuse to answer | 128 | 19.4% | |
| 98 | don't know | 9 | 1.4% | |
| 99 | skip | 85 | 12.9% | |
| Frequency : | 661 | 100% | ||
4. E2B Which party did you vote for?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 1 | KMT | 7 | 1.1% | |
| 2 | DPP | 6 | 0.9% | |
| 3 | Independents | 0 | 0% | |
| 90 | omit | 1 | 0.1% | |
| 91 | forgot | 39 | 5.9% | |
| 95 | refuse to answer | 112 | 16.9% | |
| 98 | don't know | 17 | 2.6% | |
| 99 | skip | 479 | 72.5% | |
| Frequency : | 661 | 100% | ||
5. E2C What was the main reason you voted for this candidate?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 1 | honest with integrity | 5 | 0.8% | |
| 2 | capable of governing | 29 | 4.4% | |
| 3 | prefer to pan-blue | 2 | 0.3% | |
| 4 | better than any other candidates | 8 | 1.2% | |
| 5 | don't vote for DPP(oppose DPP) | 4 | 0.6% | |
| 6 | identify with PFP | 0 | 0% | |
| 7 | try a change of hands(discontent with the incumbent) | 41 | 6.2% | |
| 8 | industrious to interrogate the administarion | 0 | 0% | |
| 9 | have good achievements in his/her official career | 1 | 0.1% | |
| 10 | have good policy statement | 22 | 3.3% | |
| 11 | have contribution to the local area(strive for local construction) | 8 | 1.2% | |
| 12 | have experience | 2 | 0.3% | |
| 13 | like him/her(have a good impression on him/her) | 16 | 2.4% | |
| 14 | identify with DPP | 13 | 2.0% | |
| 15 | dare to do and say | 0 | 0% | |
| 16 | have good performances(former term) | 5 | 0.8% | |
| 17 | someone(or the candidate) came to persuade to vote for some candidate | 4 | 0.6% | |
| 18 | in order for stability | 0 | 0% | |
| 19 | don't like other candidates | 3 | 0.4% | |
| 20 | care for people | 1 | 0.1% | |
| 21 | have no burden of party | 0 | 0% | |
| 22 | he/she is nice | 8 | 1.2% | |
| 23 | geographical relations(native, neighbor) | 20 | 3.0% | |
| 24 | have abilities | 14 | 2.1% | |
| 25 | have contribution to Taiwan | 0 | 0% | |
| 26 | hometown association(other assocation) supports some candidate | 1 | 0.1% | |
| 27 | 009 and 014 | 0 | 0% | |
| 28 | popularity | 0 | 0% | |
| 29 | friends recommend | 12 | 1.8% | |
| 30 | family members support or influence | 18 | 2.7% | |
| 31 | his/her image is straight | 5 | 0.8% | |
| 32 | support him/her | 13 | 2.0% | |
| 33 | the administrative efficacy is good | 0 | 0% | |
| 34 | promote Taiwan's localization | 0 | 0% | |
| 35 | rational and moderate | 0 | 0% | |
| 36 | more familiar with him/her | 1 | 0.1% | |
| 37 | his/her image is nice | 15 | 2.3% | |
| 38 | do things neutrally | 1 | 0.1% | |
| 39 | identify with NP | 0 | 0% | |
| 40 | appreciate Lee Teng-hui | 0 | 0% | |
| 41 | she is a woman representative | 17 | 2.6% | |
| 42 | charisma | 1 | 0.1% | |
| 43 | the head of a neighborhood of 25 families(or the head of a basic community unit) solicited vote | 0 | 0% | |
| 44 | enthusiastic | 0 | 0% | |
| 45 | pay attention to a disadvantaged minority | 1 | 0.1% | |
| 46 | concern the local people's opinions | 5 | 0.8% | |
| 47 | sympathetic vote | 0 | 0% | |
| 48 | work hard and more responsible | 2 | 0.3% | |
| 49 | identify with KMT | 22 | 3.3% | |
| 50 | his/her educational background is high | 0 | 0% | |
| 51 | the candidate is the respondent's friend(acquaint with the candidate) | 1 | 0.1% | |
| 52 | Taiwan people | 0 | 0% | |
| 53 | benefit the economy | 1 | 0.1% | |
| 54 | done what he/she said | 1 | 0.1% | |
| 55 | just want to vote for him/her | 2 | 0.3% | |
| 56 | strive for electors' welfare | 8 | 1.2% | |
| 57 | propaganda | 0 | 0% | |
| 58 | promote justice | 1 | 0.1% | |
| 59 | identify with some party | 16 | 2.4% | |
| 60 | implement his/her policies | 0 | 0% | |
| 61 | demand of work | 0 | 0% | |
| 62 | young | 1 | 0.1% | |
| 63 | the candidate is the respondent's relative(family member) | 0 | 0% | |
| 64 | famous | 0 | 0% | |
| 65 | support the incumbent | 0 | 0% | |
| 66 | allocative vote | 0 | 0% | |
| 67 | the candidate is a scholar | 0 | 0% | |
| 68 | have actual strength | 0 | 0% | |
| 69 | served many terms | 0 | 0% | |
| 70 | the candidate's elder family members had achievement in the local area | 4 | 0.6% | |
| 71 | 001 and 008 | 0 | 0% | |
| 72 | be good at manipulating politics | 0 | 0% | |
| 73 | 010 and 037 | 0 | 0% | |
| 74 | work out cross-strait relation | 0 | 0% | |
| 75 | identify with TSU | 0 | 0% | |
| 76 | need his/her professional abilities | 0 | 0% | |
| 77 | vigorous | 0 | 0% | |
| 78 | reform | 0 | 0% | |
| 79 | change KMT's old styles | 0 | 0% | |
| 80 | eloquence | 0 | 0% | |
| 81 | have good heath | 0 | 0% | |
| 82 | support the candidate of the same surname | 1 | 0.1% | |
| 83 | active | 0 | 0% | |
| 84 | served well | 3 | 0.4% | |
| 85 | the incumbent has no achievement | 0 | 0% | |
| 86 | vote of discharged military members | 0 | 0% | |
| 87 | the candidate is the respondent's chief | 0 | 0% | |
| 88 | the ruling party has plenty of resource | 0 | 0% | |
| 89 | give another party a chance(the turnover of the ruling party) | 18 | 2.7% | |
| 90 | give new candidate a chance | 2 | 0.3% | |
| 91 | personal integrity | 2 | 0.3% | |
| 92 | the candidate is cultural worker(or educative worker) | 0 | 0% | |
| 93 | relation of interest | 0 | 0% | |
| 94 | agree with his/her political idea | 3 | 0.4% | |
| 95 | do things according to principles | 0 | 0% | |
| 96 | have his/her own ideas | 0 | 0% | |
| 97 | give him/her a try again | 0 | 0% | |
| 98 | 037 and 050 | 0 | 0% | |
| 99 | the candidate is self-confident | 0 | 0% | |
| 101 | take care of his/her own people | 0 | 0% | |
| 103 | vote randomly | 12 | 1.8% | |
| 105 | honesty | 0 | 0% | |
| 106 | read the official election notice | 0 | 0% | |
| 107 | served the village head for a long time in the local area | 0 | 0% | |
| 109 | support Taiwan independence | 0 | 0% | |
| 110 | 014 and 041 | 0 | 0% | |
| 111 | care for laborers more | 1 | 0.1% | |
| 112 | check and balance between parties | 0 | 0% | |
| 114 | faction | 0 | 0% | |
| 115 | check and balance between parties | 0 | 0% | |
| 117 | take care of peasants | 5 | 0.8% | |
| 118 | dependable | 1 | 0.1% | |
| 120 | give him/her a chance | 1 | 0.1% | |
| 121 | the candidate did the elector a favor | 3 | 0.4% | |
| 122 | both the candidate's educational background and experience are nice | 1 | 0.1% | |
| 125 | young and capable of doing things | 1 | 0.1% | |
| 126 | the respondent is a party member of KMT | 2 | 0.3% | |
| 127 | identify with Taiwan | 0 | 0% | |
| 128 | the respondent's husband is a party member of KMT | 0 | 0% | |
| 131 | capable of protecting people | 0 | 0% | |
| 136 | handsome and cute(good looks) | 1 | 0.1% | |
| 137 | religious factors | 0 | 0% | |
| 138 | his/her foreground is good | 2 | 0.3% | |
| 139 | support president | 0 | 0% | |
| 140 | improve the chaos of the congress (meeting) | 0 | 0% | |
| 141 | take care of women's rights and interests | 0 | 0% | |
| 142 | think that the candidate fails to be elected, taking urgent steps to vote for him/her | 0 | 0% | |
| 143 | don't belong to any party or faction | 0 | 0% | |
| 144 | dislike KMT | 3 | 0.4% | |
| 145 | have good performance in the previous official position | 1 | 0.1% | |
| 146 | Ma Ying-jeou resign the chairman of KMT | 0 | 0% | |
| 147 | take care of the aged | 3 | 0.4% | |
| 148 | the competitor made a personal attack | 0 | 0% | |
| 149 | have a international viewpoint | 0 | 0% | |
| 150 | there are some problems with the candidate's health | 0 | 0% | |
| 151 | strategic voting | 0 | 0% | |
| 152 | sincereness | 2 | 0.3% | |
| 153 | appreciate the candidate's wife(or members of family) | 1 | 0.1% | |
| 154 | feel disappointed with the government of DPP | 1 | 0.1% | |
| 155 | other candidates bought ballots or were involved in corruption | 2 | 0.3% | |
| 156 | vote for the candidate who fails to be elected | 1 | 0.1% | |
| 157 | the candidate's elder does badly | 3 | 0.4% | |
| 158 | do well in Kaohsiung City | 0 | 0% | |
| 159 | have the willpower | 0 | 0% | |
| 160 | background of farming family | 0 | 0% | |
| 990 | omit | 6 | 0.9% | |
| 995 | refuse to answer | 76 | 11.5% | |
| 998 | don't know | 57 | 8.6% | |
| 999 | skip | 91 | 13.8% | |
| Frequency : | 661 | 100% | ||
6. E3A Which candidate did you vote for in Yunlin County councilor Election?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 101 | Liou,Jian-Guo | 7 | 1.1% | |
| 102 | Jian,Ming-Cin | 3 | 0.4% | |
| 103 | Lin,Si-Hua | 0 | 0% | |
| 104 | Li,Jian-Sheng | 3 | 0.4% | |
| 105 | Li,Jian-Jhih | 2 | 0.3% | |
| 106 | Li,Li-Guan | 0 | 0% | |
| 107 | Li,Kun-Jheng | 1 | 0.1% | |
| 108 | Jhou,Siou-Yue | 3 | 0.4% | |
| 109 | Cai,Yu-Shuang | 2 | 0.3% | |
| 110 | Jhang,Jhen-Cheng | 0 | 0% | |
| 111 | Chen,Cing-Yun | 0 | 0% | |
| 112 | Chen,He-Shan | 1 | 0.1% | |
| 113 | Lin,Shu-Fen | 5 | 0.8% | |
| 114 | Huang,Yao-Huang | 2 | 0.3% | |
| 201 | Lin,Zai-Tian | 5 | 0.8% | |
| 202 | Wang,Ciou-Zu | 5 | 0.8% | |
| 203 | Sie,Shu-Ya | 32 | 4.8% | |
| 204 | Lin,Chao-Bao | 2 | 0.3% | |
| 205 | Jhong,Jyun-Sing | 10 | 1.5% | |
| 206 | Wang,Siou-Yan | 4 | 0.6% | |
| 207 | Jian,Jin-Cyuan | 6 | 0.9% | |
| 208 | Li,Jhang-Fa | 2 | 0.3% | |
| 209 | Shen,Ming-Gong | 10 | 1.5% | |
| 210 | Wu,Cang-De | 2 | 0.3% | |
| 301 | Li,Mei-Lan | 0 | 0% | |
| 302 | Chen,Cing-Siou | 5 | 0.8% | |
| 303 | Wang,Shi-Ren | 8 | 1.2% | |
| 304 | Chen,Ruei-Syong | 13 | 2.0% | |
| 305 | Chen,Min-Hua | 3 | 0.4% | |
| 306 | Liao,Yi-Jhen | 5 | 0.8% | |
| 307 | Shen,Zong-Long | 7 | 1.1% | |
| 308 | Lin,Mei-Nan | 2 | 0.3% | |
| 309 | Sie,Cuei-Lian | 27 | 4.1% | |
| 310 | Li,Jian-Fu | 1 | 0.1% | |
| 311 | Cai,Ming-Shuei | 0 | 0% | |
| 312 | Lin,Sin-Ding | 1 | 0.1% | |
| 313 | Syu,Wei-Siou | 4 | 0.6% | |
| 314 | Sie,Yi-Jin | 3 | 0.4% | |
| 315 | Huang,Jin-Yi | 8 | 1.2% | |
| 401 | Jheng,Ling-Huei | 0 | 0% | |
| 402 | Wang,Tie-Dao | 2 | 0.3% | |
| 403 | Liao,Ciou-Ping | 1 | 0.1% | |
| 404 | Lin,Ding-Cai | 0 | 0% | |
| 405 | Liao,Cing-Siang | 21 | 3.2% | |
| 406 | Li,He-Tong | 1 | 0.1% | |
| 407 | Jhan,Wun-Cyu | 1 | 0.1% | |
| 408 | Li,Jia-Fen | 3 | 0.4% | |
| 409 | Liao,Wei-Bo | 3 | 0.4% | |
| 410 | Liang,Ming-Jhong | 1 | 0.1% | |
| 411 | Liao,Jin-Jhu | 14 | 2.1% | |
| 412 | Jhan,Jie-Kai | 1 | 0.1% | |
| 501 | Jhang,Su-Lan | 13 | 2.0% | |
| 502 | Su,Jin-Huang | 14 | 2.1% | |
| 503 | Syu,Jhong-Fu | 0 | 0% | |
| 504 | Hou,Ji-Rong | 1 | 0.1% | |
| 505 | Lin,Jheng-Jhong | 9 | 1.4% | |
| 506 | Huang,Shu-Jhen | 0 | 0% | |
| 507 | Wang,Cing-Guei | 2 | 0.3% | |
| 508 | Lin,Zong-Hong | 7 | 1.1% | |
| 509 | Chen,Jheng-Jhong | 1 | 0.1% | |
| 510 | Lin,Wun-Sin | 4 | 0.6% | |
| 511 | Ding,Cing-Le | 0 | 0% | |
| 512 | Jheng,Dong-Lai | 7 | 1.1% | |
| 601 | Lin,Fong-Jin | 8 | 1.2% | |
| 602 | Wang,Cong-Ming | 0 | 0% | |
| 603 | Wong,Shuei-Shang | 2 | 0.3% | |
| 604 | Li,Zong-Yuan | 0 | 0% | |
| 605 | Lin,Jhe-Ling | 6 | 0.9% | |
| 606 | Siao,Huei-Min | 4 | 0.6% | |
| 607 | Chen,Jian-Hua | 4 | 0.6% | |
| 608 | Wu,Yi-Dao | 2 | 0.3% | |
| 609 | Cai,Yue-Ru | 10 | 1.5% | |
| 610 | Cai,Yong-Chang | 2 | 0.3% | |
| 9990 | omit | 0 | 0% | |
| 9991 | forgot | 98 | 14.8% | |
| 9992 | invalid vote | 9 | 1.4% | |
| 9993 | the census register isn't here | 1 | 0.1% | |
| 9995 | refuse to answer | 111 | 16.8% | |
| 9998 | don't know | 19 | 2.9% | |
| 9999 | skip | 85 | 12.9% | |
| Frequency : | 661 | 100% | ||
7. E3B Which party did you vote for?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 1 | KMT | 17 | 2.6% | |
| 2 | DPP | 11 | 1.7% | |
| 3 | NP | 0 | 0% | |
| 4 | PFP | 1 | 0.1% | |
| 5 | TAI | 0 | 0% | |
| 6 | TSU | 0 | 0% | |
| 7 | independents | 3 | 0.4% | |
| 8 | pan-blue | 0 | 0% | |
| 9 | pan-green | 0 | 0% | |
| 90 | omit | 10 | 1.5% | |
| 91 | forgot | 68 | 10.3% | |
| 95 | refuse to answer | 91 | 13.8% | |
| 98 | don't know | 27 | 4.1% | |
| 99 | skip | 433 | 65.5% | |
| Frequency : | 661 | 100% | ||
8. E4A Which candidate did you vote for in Yunlin County Township Magistrate Election?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 101 | Jhang,He-Ping | 33 | 5.0% | |
| 102 | Chen,Cing-Sing | 5 | 0.8% | |
| 201 | Huang,Fu-Cyong | 26 | 3.9% | |
| 202 | Jhang,Sheng-Syong | 12 | 1.8% | |
| 301 | Lin,Ming-Tian | 6 | 0.9% | |
| 302 | Lin,Wun-Bin | 4 | 0.6% | |
| 303 | Chen,Jhen-Huei | 11 | 1.7% | |
| 304 | Cai,Ciou-Min | 20 | 3.0% | |
| 501 | Jhang,Yuan-Jhong | 30 | 4.5% | |
| 601 | Siao,Yong-Yi | 14 | 2.1% | |
| 602 | Cai,Zong-Jhe | 2 | 0.3% | |
| 603 | Syu,Jhong-Che | 34 | 5.1% | |
| 701 | Lin,Huei-Ru | 35 | 5.3% | |
| 702 | Huang-Jhong-Sing | 4 | 0.6% | |
| 703 | Wei,Li-Hua | 6 | 0.9% | |
| 1101 | Liao,Chao-Kuei | 32 | 4.8% | |
| 1102 | Jhong,He-Lang | 7 | 1.1% | |
| 1501 | Chen,Jin-Hou | 26 | 3.9% | |
| 1502 | Liou,Ming-Syong | 6 | 0.9% | |
| 1601 | Li,Pei-Yuan | 24 | 3.6% | |
| 1602 | Lin,Shu-Ji | 14 | 2.1% | |
| 1801 | Wu,Tian-Cih | 13 | 2.0% | |
| 1802 | Wang,Cheng | 21 | 3.2% | |
| 9990 | omit | 0 | 0% | |
| 9991 | forgot | 52 | 7.9% | |
| 9992 | invalid vote | 30 | 4.5% | |
| 9993 | the census register isn't here | 2 | 0.3% | |
| 9995 | refuse to answer | 98 | 14.8% | |
| 9998 | don't know | 9 | 1.4% | |
| 9999 | skip | 85 | 12.9% | |
| Frequency : | 661 | 100% | ||
9. E4B Which party did you vote for?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 1 | KMT | 8 | 1.2% | |
| 2 | DPP | 3 | 0.4% | |
| 3 | NP | 0 | 0% | |
| 4 | PFP | 0 | 0% | |
| 5 | TAI | 0 | 0% | |
| 6 | TSU | 0 | 0% | |
| 7 | independents | 0 | 0% | |
| 8 | pan-blue | 0 | 0% | |
| 9 | pan-green | 0 | 0% | |
| 90 | omit | 9 | 1.4% | |
| 91 | forgot | 37 | 5.6% | |
| 95 | refuse to answer | 86 | 13.0% | |
| 98 | don't know | 18 | 2.7% | |
| 99 | skip | 500 | 75.6% | |
| Frequency : | 661 | 100% | ||
