:::
TEDS Table of Project lists >
TEDS2004P >
The Survey of Presidential Election in 2004 (Independence)
Classification Questionnaire :
1. R01 Which of the following incidents had the biggest effect on your vote decision?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
1 | Wu Sue-jen buying and selling stocks | 72 | 4.0% | |
2 | the origins of Lien Chan's property | 36 | 2.0% | |
3 | Chen You-hao's political monetary contributions | 54 | 3.0% | |
4 | the question of the KMT's financial assets | 83 | 4.5% | |
5 | the March 19 shooting incident | 351 | 19.2% | |
6 | the February 28 Hand-In-Hand Rally | 289 | 15.8% | |
7 | the March 13 Change the President, Save Taiwan Rally | 97 | 5.3% | |
90 | omit | 0 | 0% | |
92 | none had any influence | 727 | 39.9% | |
95 | refuse to answer | 19 | 1.0% | |
98 | don't know | 95 | 5.2% | |
Frequency : | 1823 | 100% |
2. R1A Which one had the second most effect?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
1 | Wu Sue-jen buying and selling stocks | 119 | 6.5% | |
2 | the origins of Lien Chan's property | 91 | 5.0% | |
3 | Chen You-hao's political monetary contributions | 120 | 6.6% | |
4 | the question of the KMT's financial assets | 110 | 6.0% | |
5 | the March 19 shooting incident | 131 | 7.2% | |
6 | the February 28 Hand-In-Hand Rally | 98 | 5.4% | |
7 | the March 13 Change the President, Save Taiwan Rally | 93 | 5.1% | |
8 | none | 220 | 12.1% | |
9 | Sing-piao scandal | 0 | 0% | |
90 | omit | 0 | 0% | |
99 | skip | 841 | 46.1% | |
Frequency : | 1823 | 100% |
3. R1B Which one had the third most effect?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
1 | Wu Sue-jen buying and selling stocks | 77 | 4.2% | |
2 | the origins of Lien Chan's property | 73 | 4.0% | |
3 | Chen You-hao's political monetary contributions | 99 | 5.4% | |
4 | the question of the KMT's financial assets | 96 | 5.3% | |
5 | the March 19 shooting incident | 74 | 4.1% | |
6 | the February 28 Hand-In-Hand Rally | 64 | 3.5% | |
7 | the March 13 Change the President, Save Taiwan Rally | 80 | 4.4% | |
8 | none | 199 | 10.9% | |
9 | Sing-piao scandal | 0 | 0% | |
90 | omit | 0 | 0% | |
99 | skip | 1061 | 58.2% | |
Frequency : | 1823 | 100% |
4. R02 During this presidential election campaign, both the pan-blue and pan-green camps held several large-scale events. Did you participate in the pan-green camp's February 28 Hand-In-Hand event?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
1 | yes | 223 | 12.2% | |
2 | no | 1569 | 86.1% | |
90 | omit | 2 | 0.1% | |
95 | refuse to answer | 5 | 0.3% | |
98 | don't know | 24 | 1.3% | |
Frequency : | 1823 | 100% |
5. R2A Did you participate in the pan-blue camp's March 13 Change the President, Save Taiwan march?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
1 | yes | 89 | 4.9% | |
2 | no | 1705 | 93.5% | |
90 | omit | 1 | 0.1% | |
95 | refuse to answer | 3 | 0.2% | |
98 | don't know | 25 | 1.4% | |
Frequency : | 1823 | 100% |
6. R3A First, do you think this presidential election helped to promote ethnic harmony, intensify ethnic conflict, or did it not have any influence in this area?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
1 | promoted ethnic harmony | 221 | 12.1% | |
2 | intensified ethnic conflict | 1004 | 55.1% | |
3 | no influence in this area | 427 | 23.4% | |
90 | omit | 0 | 0% | |
95 | refuse to answer | 9 | 0.5% | |
96 | it's depended | 5 | 0.3% | |
97 | none opinion | 19 | 1.0% | |
98 | don't know | 138 | 7.6% | |
Frequency : | 1823 | 100% |
7. R3AA How large was the influence?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
1 | very strong influence | 684 | 37.5% | |
2 | some influence | 490 | 26.9% | |
90 | omit | 2 | 0.1% | |
95 | refuse to answer | 1 | 0.1% | |
96 | it's depended | 32 | 1.8% | |
97 | none opinion | 2 | 0.1% | |
98 | don't know | 14 | 0.8% | |
99 | skip | 598 | 32.8% | |
Frequency : | 1823 | 100% |
8. R3B Do you think this presidential election strengthened the popular consciousness for Taiwan independence, strengthened the popular consciousness for Chinese unification, or did it not have any influence in this area?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
1 | strengthened Taiwan independence | 817 | 44.8% | |
2 | strengthened Chinese unification | 99 | 5.4% | |
3 | no influence in this area | 598 | 32.8% | |
4 | both were strengthened | 99 | 5.4% | |
90 | omit | 2 | 0.1% | |
95 | refuse to answer | 12 | 0.7% | |
96 | it's depended | 4 | 0.2% | |
97 | none opinion | 19 | 1.0% | |
98 | don't know | 173 | 9.5% | |
Frequency : | 1823 | 100% |
9. R3BB How large was the influence?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
1 | very strong influence | 371 | 20.3% | |
2 | some influence | 500 | 27.4% | |
90 | omit | 1 | 0.1% | |
95 | refuse to answer | 2 | 0.1% | |
96 | it's depended | 23 | 1.3% | |
97 | none opinion | 8 | 0.4% | |
98 | don't know | 11 | 0.6% | |
99 | skip | 907 | 49.8% | |
Frequency : | 1823 | 100% |
10. R3C Do you think this presidential election improved democracy in Taiwan, damaged democracy in Taiwan, or did it not have any influence in this area?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
1 | improved democracy | 592 | 32.5% | |
2 | damaged democracy | 697 | 38.2% | |
3 | no influence in this area | 347 | 19.0% | |
90 | omit | 1 | 0.1% | |
95 | refuse to answer | 13 | 0.7% | |
96 | it's depended | 13 | 0.7% | |
97 | none opinion | 11 | 0.6% | |
98 | don't know | 149 | 8.2% | |
Frequency : | 1823 | 100% |
11. R3CC How large was the influence?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
1 | very strong influence | 586 | 32.1% | |
2 | some influence | 638 | 35.0% | |
90 | omit | 1 | 0.1% | |
95 | refuse to answer | 2 | 0.1% | |
96 | it's depended | 36 | 2.0% | |
97 | none opinion | 4 | 0.2% | |
98 | don't know | 22 | 1.2% | |
99 | skip | 534 | 29.3% | |
Frequency : | 1823 | 100% |
12. R3D Do you think this presidential election promoted social stability, caused social instability, or did it not have any influence in this area?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
1 | promoted social stability | 194 | 10.6% | |
2 | caused social instability | 1224 | 67.1% | |
3 | no influence in this area | 288 | 15.8% | |
90 | omit | 0 | 0% | |
95 | refuse to answer | 7 | 0.4% | |
96 | it's depended | 13 | 0.7% | |
97 | none opinion | 10 | 0.5% | |
98 | don't know | 87 | 4.8% | |
Frequency : | 1823 | 100% |
13. R3DD How large was the influence?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
1 | very strong influence | 766 | 42.0% | |
2 | some influence | 607 | 33.3% | |
90 | omit | 0 | 0% | |
95 | refuse to answer | 2 | 0.1% | |
96 | it's depended | 24 | 1.3% | |
97 | none opinion | 4 | 0.2% | |
98 | don't know | 15 | 0.8% | |
99 | skip | 405 | 22.2% | |
Frequency : | 1823 | 100% |
14. R04 Overall, did you think the electoral process in this presidential election was fair or not fair?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
1 | very fair | 158 | 8.7% | |
2 | fair | 641 | 35.2% | |
3 | unfair | 528 | 29.0% | |
4 | very unfair | 237 | 13.0% | |
90 | omit | 0 | 0% | |
95 | refuse to answer | 36 | 2.0% | |
96 | it's depended | 31 | 1.7% | |
97 | none opinion | 65 | 3.6% | |
98 | don't know | 127 | 7.0% | |
Frequency : | 1823 | 100% |
15. R05 After going through this presidential election, are you pessimistic or optimistic about Taiwan's future?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
1 | very optimistic | 75 | 4.1% | |
2 | optimistic | 536 | 29.4% | |
3 | neither optimistic not pessimistic | 555 | 30.4% | |
4 | pessimistic | 383 | 21.0% | |
5 | very pessimistic | 95 | 5.2% | |
90 | omit | 0 | 0% | |
95 | refuse to answer | 13 | 0.7% | |
96 | it's depended | 32 | 1.8% | |
97 | none opinion | 24 | 1.3% | |
98 | don't know | 110 | 6.0% | |
Frequency : | 1823 | 100% |