:::
TEDS Table of Project lists >
TEDS2004L >
The Survey of Legislative Election in 2004 (A) (Independence)
Classification Questionnaire :
1. B01 What's your feeling toward Wang Jin-pyng?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
0 | 40 | 3.2% | ||
1 | 17 | 1.4% | ||
2 | 17 | 1.4% | ||
3 | 44 | 3.5% | ||
4 | 38 | 3.0% | ||
5 | 503 | 40.2% | ||
6 | 111 | 8.9% | ||
7 | 107 | 8.6% | ||
8 | 118 | 9.4% | ||
9 | 25 | 2.0% | ||
10 | 74 | 5.9% | ||
90 | omit | 0 | 0% | |
95 | refuse to answer | 6 | 0.5% | |
96 | cannot choose | 7 | 0.6% | |
97 | no opinion | 31 | 2.5% | |
98 | don’t know | 114 | 9.1% | |
Frequency : | 1252 | 100% |
2. B02 What's your feeling toward Chu Li-lun?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
0 | 38 | 3.0% | ||
1 | 8 | 0.6% | ||
2 | 11 | 0.9% | ||
3 | 33 | 2.6% | ||
4 | 21 | 1.7% | ||
5 | 320 | 25.6% | ||
6 | 93 | 7.4% | ||
7 | 122 | 9.7% | ||
8 | 126 | 10.1% | ||
9 | 29 | 2.3% | ||
10 | 56 | 4.5% | ||
90 | omit | 0 | 0% | |
95 | refuse to answer | 4 | 0.3% | |
96 | cannot choose | 7 | 0.6% | |
97 | no opinion | 54 | 4.3% | |
98 | don’t know | 330 | 26.4% | |
Frequency : | 1252 | 100% |
3. B03 How about Lee Teng-hui?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
0 | 286 | 22.8% | ||
1 | 27 | 2.2% | ||
2 | 47 | 3.8% | ||
3 | 72 | 5.8% | ||
4 | 42 | 3.4% | ||
5 | 302 | 24.1% | ||
6 | 66 | 5.3% | ||
7 | 75 | 6.0% | ||
8 | 85 | 6.8% | ||
9 | 39 | 3.1% | ||
10 | 122 | 9.7% | ||
90 | omit | 0 | 0% | |
95 | refuse to answer | 7 | 0.6% | |
96 | cannot choose | 8 | 0.6% | |
97 | no opinion | 34 | 2.7% | |
98 | don’t know | 40 | 3.2% | |
Frequency : | 1252 | 100% |
4. B04 How about James Soong?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
0 | 207 | 16.5% | ||
1 | 33 | 2.6% | ||
2 | 75 | 6.0% | ||
3 | 116 | 9.3% | ||
4 | 94 | 7.5% | ||
5 | 349 | 27.9% | ||
6 | 89 | 7.1% | ||
7 | 61 | 4.9% | ||
8 | 58 | 4.6% | ||
9 | 19 | 1.5% | ||
10 | 42 | 3.4% | ||
90 | omit | 0 | 0% | |
95 | refuse to answer | 8 | 0.6% | |
96 | cannot choose | 12 | 1.0% | |
97 | no opinion | 34 | 2.7% | |
98 | don’t know | 55 | 4.4% | |
Frequency : | 1252 | 100% |
5. B05 How about Annette Lu?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
0 | 143 | 11.4% | ||
1 | 24 | 1.9% | ||
2 | 61 | 4.9% | ||
3 | 95 | 7.6% | ||
4 | 94 | 7.5% | ||
5 | 396 | 31.6% | ||
6 | 111 | 8.9% | ||
7 | 93 | 7.4% | ||
8 | 68 | 5.4% | ||
9 | 17 | 1.4% | ||
10 | 47 | 3.8% | ||
90 | omit | 0 | 0% | |
95 | refuse to answer | 5 | 0.4% | |
96 | cannot choose | 9 | 0.7% | |
97 | no opinion | 33 | 2.6% | |
98 | don’t know | 56 | 4.5% | |
Frequency : | 1252 | 100% |
6. B06 How about Jason Hu?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
0 | 30 | 2.4% | ||
1 | 7 | 0.6% | ||
2 | 15 | 1.2% | ||
3 | 32 | 2.6% | ||
4 | 26 | 2.1% | ||
5 | 371 | 29.6% | ||
6 | 141 | 11.3% | ||
7 | 175 | 14.0% | ||
8 | 164 | 13.1% | ||
9 | 42 | 3.4% | ||
10 | 70 | 5.6% | ||
90 | omit | 0 | 0% | |
95 | refuse to answer | 7 | 0.6% | |
96 | cannot choose | 6 | 0.5% | |
97 | no opinion | 33 | 2.6% | |
98 | don’t know | 133 | 10.6% | |
Frequency : | 1252 | 100% |
7. B07 How about Ma Ying-jeou?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
0 | 56 | 4.5% | ||
1 | 10 | 0.8% | ||
2 | 28 | 2.2% | ||
3 | 33 | 2.6% | ||
4 | 29 | 2.3% | ||
5 | 258 | 20.6% | ||
6 | 105 | 8.4% | ||
7 | 123 | 9.8% | ||
8 | 187 | 14.9% | ||
9 | 115 | 9.2% | ||
10 | 212 | 16.9% | ||
90 | omit | 1 | 0.1% | |
95 | refuse to answer | 6 | 0.5% | |
96 | cannot choose | 7 | 0.6% | |
97 | no opinion | 28 | 2.2% | |
98 | don’t know | 54 | 4.3% | |
Frequency : | 1252 | 100% |
8. B08 How about Chen Shui-bian?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
0 | 161 | 12.9% | ||
1 | 23 | 1.8% | ||
2 | 49 | 3.9% | ||
3 | 48 | 3.8% | ||
4 | 58 | 4.6% | ||
5 | 278 | 22.2% | ||
6 | 103 | 8.2% | ||
7 | 134 | 10.7% | ||
8 | 139 | 11.1% | ||
9 | 47 | 3.8% | ||
10 | 139 | 11.1% | ||
90 | omit | 0 | 0% | |
95 | refuse to answer | 6 | 0.5% | |
96 | cannot choose | 9 | 0.7% | |
97 | no opinion | 27 | 2.2% | |
98 | don’t know | 31 | 2.5% | |
Frequency : | 1252 | 100% |
9. B09 How about Lien Chan?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
0 | 144 | 11.5% | ||
1 | 32 | 2.6% | ||
2 | 70 | 5.6% | ||
3 | 113 | 9.0% | ||
4 | 93 | 7.4% | ||
5 | 396 | 31.6% | ||
6 | 121 | 9.7% | ||
7 | 67 | 5.3% | ||
8 | 60 | 4.8% | ||
9 | 22 | 1.8% | ||
10 | 38 | 3.0% | ||
90 | omit | 0 | 0% | |
95 | refuse to answer | 6 | 0.5% | |
96 | cannot choose | 11 | 0.9% | |
97 | no opinion | 31 | 2.5% | |
98 | don’t know | 48 | 3.8% | |
Frequency : | 1252 | 100% |
10. B10 How about Yu Shyi-kun?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
0 | 71 | 5.7% | ||
1 | 25 | 2.0% | ||
2 | 37 | 3.0% | ||
3 | 58 | 4.6% | ||
4 | 56 | 4.5% | ||
5 | 352 | 28.1% | ||
6 | 152 | 12.1% | ||
7 | 122 | 9.7% | ||
8 | 116 | 9.3% | ||
9 | 39 | 3.1% | ||
10 | 68 | 5.4% | ||
90 | omit | 2 | 0.2% | |
95 | refuse to answer | 6 | 0.5% | |
96 | cannot choose | 7 | 0.6% | |
97 | no opinion | 34 | 2.7% | |
98 | don’t know | 107 | 8.6% | |
Frequency : | 1252 | 100% |
11. B11 How about Frank Hsieh?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
0 | 73 | 5.8% | ||
1 | 16 | 1.3% | ||
2 | 36 | 2.9% | ||
3 | 51 | 4.1% | ||
4 | 48 | 3.8% | ||
5 | 314 | 25.1% | ||
6 | 143 | 11.4% | ||
7 | 137 | 10.9% | ||
8 | 164 | 13.1% | ||
9 | 58 | 4.6% | ||
10 | 80 | 6.4% | ||
90 | omit | 0 | 0% | |
95 | refuse to answer | 4 | 0.3% | |
96 | cannot choose | 9 | 0.7% | |
97 | no opinion | 36 | 2.9% | |
98 | don’t know | 83 | 6.6% | |
Frequency : | 1252 | 100% |
12. B12 How about Su Tseng-chang?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
0 | 59 | 4.7% | ||
1 | 16 | 1.3% | ||
2 | 29 | 2.3% | ||
3 | 51 | 4.1% | ||
4 | 55 | 4.4% | ||
5 | 287 | 22.9% | ||
6 | 125 | 10.0% | ||
7 | 153 | 12.2% | ||
8 | 158 | 12.6% | ||
9 | 78 | 6.2% | ||
10 | 98 | 7.8% | ||
90 | omit | 0 | 0% | |
95 | refuse to answer | 4 | 0.3% | |
96 | cannot choose | 9 | 0.7% | |
97 | no opinion | 32 | 2.6% | |
98 | don’t know | 98 | 7.8% | |
Frequency : | 1252 | 100% |