:::
TEDS Table of Project lists >
TEDS2013-PA12 >
Internet Survey of the Presidential Satisfaction--Sixth Wave
Classification Questionnaire :
1. Are you satisfied with the overall performance of Lin, Tsung-Hsien as county magistrate over the last three years?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 1 | Very satisfied | 0 | 0% | |
| 2 | Satisfied | 2 | 0.6% | |
| 3 | Not very satisfied | 2 | 0.6% | |
| 4 | Not satisfied at all | 0 | 0% | |
| 99 | Skipped | 314 | 98.7% | |
| Frequency : | 318 | 100% | ||
2. Are you satisfied with the overall performance of Wu, Chih-Yang as county mayor over the last three years?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 1 | Very satisfied | 1 | 0.3% | |
| 2 | Satisfied | 11 | 3.5% | |
| 3 | Not very satisfied | 7 | 2.2% | |
| 4 | Not satisfied at all | 3 | 0.9% | |
| 99 | Skipped | 296 | 93.1% | |
| Frequency : | 318 | 100% | ||
3. Are you satisfied with the overall performance of Chiu, Ching-Chun as county magistrate over the last three years?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 1 | Very satisfied | 2 | 0.6% | |
| 2 | Satisfied | 4 | 1.3% | |
| 3 | Not very satisfied | 4 | 1.3% | |
| 4 | Not satisfied at all | 1 | 0.3% | |
| 99 | Skipped | 307 | 96.5% | |
| Frequency : | 318 | 100% | ||
4. Are you satisfied with the overall performance of Liu, Cheng-Hung as county magistrate over the last three years?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 1 | Very satisfied | 0 | 0% | |
| 2 | Satisfied | 1 | 0.3% | |
| 3 | Not very satisfied | 0 | 0% | |
| 4 | Not satisfied at all | 1 | 0.3% | |
| 99 | Skipped | 316 | 99.4% | |
| Frequency : | 318 | 100% | ||
5. Are you satisfied with the overall performance of Cho, Po-Yuan as county magistrate over the last three years?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 1 | Very satisfied | 2 | 0.6% | |
| 2 | Satisfied | 4 | 1.3% | |
| 3 | Not very satisfied | 6 | 1.9% | |
| 4 | Not satisfied at all | 1 | 0.3% | |
| 99 | Skipped | 305 | 95.9% | |
| Frequency : | 318 | 100% | ||
6. Are you satisfied with the overall performance of Lee Chao-Ching as county magistrate over the last three years?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 1 | Very satisfied | 0 | 0% | |
| 2 | Satisfied | 1 | 0.3% | |
| 3 | Not very satisfied | 3 | 0.9% | |
| 4 | Not satisfied at all | 4 | 1.3% | |
| 99 | Skipped | 310 | 97.5% | |
| Frequency : | 318 | 100% | ||
7. Are you satisfied with the overall performance of Su, Chih-Fen as county magistrate over the last three years?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 1 | Very satisfied | 1 | 0.3% | |
| 2 | Satisfied | 4 | 1.3% | |
| 3 | Not very satisfied | 1 | 0.3% | |
| 4 | Not satisfied at all | 1 | 0.3% | |
| 99 | Skipped | 311 | 97.8% | |
| Frequency : | 318 | 100% | ||
8. Are you satisfied with the overall performance of Chang,Hwa-Kuan as county magistrate over the last three years?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 1 | Very satisfied | 0 | 0% | |
| 2 | Satisfied | 1 | 0.3% | |
| 3 | Not very satisfied | 1 | 0.3% | |
| 4 | Not satisfied at all | 0 | 0% | |
| 99 | Skipped | 316 | 99.4% | |
| Frequency : | 318 | 100% | ||
9. Are you satisfied with the overall performance of Tsao, Chi-Hung as county magistrate over the last three years?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 1 | Very satisfied | 0 | 0% | |
| 2 | Satisfied | 4 | 1.3% | |
| 3 | Not very satisfied | 0 | 0% | |
| 4 | Not satisfied at all | 2 | 0.6% | |
| 99 | Skipped | 312 | 98.1% | |
| Frequency : | 318 | 100% | ||
10. Are you satisfied with the overall performance of Justin Huang, as county magistrate over the last three years?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 1 | Very satisfied | 0 | 0% | |
| 2 | Satisfied | 0 | 0% | |
| 3 | Not very satisfied | 0 | 0% | |
| 4 | Not satisfied at all | 1 | 0.3% | |
| 99 | Skipped | 317 | 99.7% | |
| Frequency : | 318 | 100% | ||
11. Are you satisfied with the overall performance of Fu, Kun-Chi as county magistrate over the last three years?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 1 | Very satisfied | 0 | 0% | |
| 2 | Satisfied | 1 | 0.3% | |
| 3 | Not very satisfied | 0 | 0% | |
| 4 | Not satisfied at all | 0 | 0% | |
| 99 | Skipped | 317 | 99.7% | |
| Frequency : | 318 | 100% | ||
12. Are you satisfied with the overall performance of Wang, Chien-fa as county magistrate over the last three years?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 1 | Very satisfied | 0 | 0% | |
| 2 | Satisfied | 0 | 0% | |
| 3 | Not very satisfied | 0 | 0% | |
| 4 | Not satisfied at all | 1 | 0.3% | |
| 99 | Skipped | 317 | 99.7% | |
| Frequency : | 318 | 100% | ||
13. Are you satisfied with the overall performance of Li, Wo-Shi as county magistrate over the last three years?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 1 | Very satisfied | 0 | 0% | |
| 2 | Satisfied | 0 | 0% | |
| 3 | Not very satisfied | 1 | 0.3% | |
| 4 | Not satisfied at all | 0 | 0% | |
| 99 | Skipped | 317 | 99.7% | |
| Frequency : | 318 | 100% | ||
14. Are you satisfied with the overall performance of Yang, Sui-Sheng as county magistrate over the last three years?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 1 | Very satisfied | 0 | 0% | |
| 2 | Satisfied | 0 | 0% | |
| 3 | Not very satisfied | 0 | 0% | |
| 4 | Not satisfied at all | 0 | 0% | |
| 99 | Skipped | 318 | 100% | |
| Frequency : | 318 | 100% | ||
15. Are you satisfied with the overall performance of Chang, Tong-rong as city mayor over the last three years?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 1 | Very satisfied | 0 | 0% | |
| 2 | Satisfied | 1 | 0.3% | |
| 3 | Not very satisfied | 1 | 0.3% | |
| 4 | Not satisfied at all | 5 | 1.6% | |
| 99 | Skipped | 311 | 97.8% | |
| Frequency : | 318 | 100% | ||
16. Are you satisfied with the overall performance of Hsu, Ming-Tsai as city mayor over the last three years?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 1 | Very satisfied | 0 | 0% | |
| 2 | Satisfied | 4 | 1.3% | |
| 3 | Not very satisfied | 3 | 0.9% | |
| 4 | Not satisfied at all | 1 | 0.3% | |
| 99 | Skipped | 310 | 97.5% | |
| Frequency : | 318 | 100% | ||
17. Are you satisfied with the overall performance of Huang, Min Huei as city mayor over the last three years?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 1 | Very satisfied | 0 | 0% | |
| 2 | Satisfied | 2 | 0.6% | |
| 3 | Not very satisfied | 0 | 0% | |
| 4 | Not satisfied at all | 0 | 0% | |
| 99 | Skipped | 316 | 99.4% | |
| Frequency : | 318 | 100% | ||
18. Are you satisfied with the overall performance of Hau, Lung-Bin as city mayor over the last three years?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 1 | Very satisfied | 5 | 1.6% | |
| 2 | Satisfied | 15 | 4.7% | |
| 3 | Not very satisfied | 22 | 6.9% | |
| 4 | Not satisfied at all | 9 | 2.8% | |
| 99 | Skipped | 267 | 84.0% | |
| Frequency : | 318 | 100% | ||
19. Are you satisfied with the overall performance of Chen, Chu as city mayor over the last three years?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 1 | Very satisfied | 5 | 1.6% | |
| 2 | Satisfied | 15 | 4.7% | |
| 3 | Not very satisfied | 8 | 2.5% | |
| 4 | Not satisfied at all | 2 | 0.6% | |
| 99 | Skipped | 288 | 90.6% | |
| Frequency : | 318 | 100% | ||
20. Are you satisfied with the overall performance of Eric Liluan Chu as city mayor over the last three years?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 1 | Very satisfied | 6 | 1.9% | |
| 2 | Satisfied | 39 | 12.3% | |
| 3 | Not very satisfied | 14 | 4.4% | |
| 4 | Not satisfied at all | 5 | 1.6% | |
| 99 | Skipped | 254 | 79.9% | |
| Frequency : | 318 | 100% | ||
21. Are you satisfied with the overall performance of Jason Hu as city mayor over the last three years?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 1 | Very satisfied | 4 | 1.3% | |
| 2 | Satisfied | 20 | 6.3% | |
| 3 | Not very satisfied | 9 | 2.8% | |
| 4 | Not satisfied at all | 10 | 3.1% | |
| 99 | Skipped | 275 | 86.5% | |
| Frequency : | 318 | 100% | ||
22. Are you satisfied with the overall performance of Lai, Ching-Te as city mayor over the last three years?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 1 | Very satisfied | 6 | 1.9% | |
| 2 | Satisfied | 26 | 8.2% | |
| 3 | Not very satisfied | 2 | 0.6% | |
| 4 | Not satisfied at all | 0 | 0% | |
| 99 | Skipped | 284 | 89.3% | |
| Frequency : | 318 | 100% | ||
