:::
TEDS Table of Project lists >
TEDS2014_PA12 >
Internet Survey of the Presidential Satisfaction-- Tenth Wave
Classification Questionnaire :
1. Are you satisfied with the overall performance of Lin, Tsung-Hsien as county magistrate over the last four years?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 1 | Very satisfied | 3 | 0.6% | |
| 2 | Satisfied | 12 | 2.4% | |
| 3 | Not very satisfied | 13 | 2.5% | |
| 4 | Not satisfied at all | 2 | 0.4% | |
| 99 | Skipped | 479 | 94.1% | |
| Frequency : | 509 | 100% | ||
2. Are you satisfied with the overall performance of Wu, Chih-Yang as county mayor over the last four years?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 1 | Very satisfied | 6 | 1.2% | |
| 2 | Satisfied | 18 | 3.5% | |
| 3 | Not very satisfied | 26 | 5.1% | |
| 4 | Not satisfied at all | 10 | 2.0% | |
| 99 | Skipped | 449 | 88.2% | |
| Frequency : | 509 | 100% | ||
3. Are you satisfied with the overall performance of Chiu, Ching-Chun as county magistrate over the last four years?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 1 | Very satisfied | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 2 | Satisfied | 7 | 1.4% | |
| 3 | Not very satisfied | 8 | 1.6% | |
| 4 | Not satisfied at all | 0 | 0% | |
| 99 | Skipped | 493 | 96.9% | |
| Frequency : | 509 | 100% | ||
4. Are you satisfied with the overall performance of Liu, Cheng-Hung as county magistrate over the last four years?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 1 | Very satisfied | 0 | 0% | |
| 2 | Satisfied | 3 | 0.6% | |
| 3 | Not very satisfied | 0 | 0% | |
| 4 | Not satisfied at all | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 99 | Skipped | 505 | 99.2% | |
| Frequency : | 509 | 100% | ||
5. Are you satisfied with the overall performance of Cho, Po-Yuan as county magistrate over the last four years?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 1 | Very satisfied | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 2 | Satisfied | 8 | 1.6% | |
| 3 | Not very satisfied | 8 | 1.6% | |
| 4 | Not satisfied at all | 5 | 1.0% | |
| 99 | Skipped | 487 | 95.7% | |
| Frequency : | 509 | 100% | ||
6. Are you satisfied with the overall performance of Lee Chao-Ching as county magistrate over the last four years?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 1 | Very satisfied | 0 | 0% | |
| 2 | Satisfied | 0 | 0% | |
| 3 | Not very satisfied | 4 | 0.8% | |
| 4 | Not satisfied at all | 3 | 0.6% | |
| 99 | Skipped | 502 | 98.6% | |
| Frequency : | 509 | 100% | ||
7. Are you satisfied with the overall performance of Su, Chih-Fen as county magistrate over the last four years?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 1 | Very satisfied | 2 | 0.4% | |
| 2 | Satisfied | 13 | 2.5% | |
| 3 | Not very satisfied | 8 | 1.6% | |
| 4 | Not satisfied at all | 2 | 0.4% | |
| 99 | Skipped | 484 | 95.1% | |
| Frequency : | 509 | 100% | ||
8. Are you satisfied with the overall performance of Chang,Hwa-Kuan as county magistrate over the last four years?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 1 | Very satisfied | 0 | 0% | |
| 2 | Satisfied | 0 | 0% | |
| 3 | Not very satisfied | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 4 | Not satisfied at all | 0 | 0% | |
| 99 | Skipped | 508 | 99.8% | |
| Frequency : | 509 | 100% | ||
9. Are you satisfied with the overall performance of Tsao, Chi-Hung as county magistrate over the last four years?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 1 | Very satisfied | 0 | 0% | |
| 2 | Satisfied | 2 | 0.4% | |
| 3 | Not very satisfied | 2 | 0.4% | |
| 4 | Not satisfied at all | 2 | 0.4% | |
| 99 | Skipped | 503 | 98.8% | |
| Frequency : | 509 | 100% | ||
10. Are you satisfied with the overall performance of Justin Huang, as county magistrate over the last four years?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 1 | Very satisfied | 0 | 0% | |
| 2 | Satisfied | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 3 | Not very satisfied | 0 | 0% | |
| 4 | Not satisfied at all | 0 | 0% | |
| 99 | Skipped | 508 | 99.8% | |
| Frequency : | 509 | 100% | ||
11. Are you satisfied with the overall performance of Fu, Kun-Chi as county magistrate over the last four years?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 1 | Very satisfied | 0 | 0% | |
| 2 | Satisfied | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 3 | Not very satisfied | 0 | 0% | |
| 4 | Not satisfied at all | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 99 | Skipped | 507 | 99.6% | |
| Frequency : | 509 | 100% | ||
12. Are you satisfied with the overall performance of Wang, Chien-fa as county magistrate over the last four years?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 1 | Very satisfied | 0 | 0% | |
| 2 | Satisfied | 0 | 0% | |
| 3 | Not very satisfied | 0 | 0% | |
| 4 | Not satisfied at all | 0 | 0% | |
| 99 | Skipped | 509 | 100% | |
| Frequency : | 509 | 100% | ||
13. Are you satisfied with the overall performance of Li, Wo-Shi as county magistrate over the last four years?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 1 | Very satisfied | 0 | 0% | |
| 2 | Satisfied | 0 | 0% | |
| 3 | Not very satisfied | 0 | 0% | |
| 4 | Not satisfied at all | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 99 | Skipped | 508 | 99.8% | |
| Frequency : | 509 | 100% | ||
14. Are you satisfied with the overall performance of Yang, Sui-Sheng as county magistrate over the last four years?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 1 | Very satisfied | 0 | 0% | |
| 2 | Satisfied | 0 | 0% | |
| 3 | Not very satisfied | 0 | 0% | |
| 4 | Not satisfied at all | 0 | 0% | |
| 99 | Skipped | 509 | 100% | |
| Frequency : | 509 | 100% | ||
15. Are you satisfied with the overall performance of Chang, Tong-rong as county magistrate over the last four years?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 1 | Very satisfied | 0 | 0% | |
| 2 | Satisfied | 0 | 0% | |
| 3 | Not very satisfied | 2 | 0.4% | |
| 4 | Not satisfied at all | 6 | 1.2% | |
| 99 | Skipped | 501 | 98.4% | |
| Frequency : | 509 | 100% | ||
16. Are you satisfied with the overall performance of Hsu, Ming-Tsai as city mayor over the last four years?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 1 | Very satisfied | 0 | 0% | |
| 2 | Satisfied | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 3 | Not very satisfied | 2 | 0.4% | |
| 4 | Not satisfied at all | 2 | 0.4% | |
| 99 | Skipped | 504 | 99.0% | |
| Frequency : | 509 | 100% | ||
17. Are you satisfied with the overall performance of Huang, Min Huei as city mayor over the last four years?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 1 | Very satisfied | 2 | 0.4% | |
| 2 | Satisfied | 2 | 0.4% | |
| 3 | Not very satisfied | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 4 | Not satisfied at all | 0 | 0% | |
| 99 | Skipped | 504 | 99.0% | |
| Frequency : | 509 | 100% | ||
18. Are you satisfied with the overall performance of Hau, Lung-Bin as city mayor over the last four years?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 1 | Very satisfied | 8 | 1.6% | |
| 2 | Satisfied | 26 | 5.1% | |
| 3 | Not very satisfied | 27 | 5.3% | |
| 4 | Not satisfied at all | 10 | 2.0% | |
| 99 | Skipped | 438 | 86.1% | |
| Frequency : | 509 | 100% | ||
19. Are you satisfied with the overall performance of Chen, Chu as city mayor over the last four years?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 1 | Very satisfied | 12 | 2.4% | |
| 2 | Satisfied | 16 | 3.1% | |
| 3 | Not very satisfied | 10 | 2.0% | |
| 4 | Not satisfied at all | 5 | 1.0% | |
| 99 | Skipped | 466 | 91.5% | |
| Frequency : | 509 | 100% | ||
20. Are you satisfied with the overall performance of Eric Liluan Chu as city mayor over the last four years?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 1 | Very satisfied | 17 | 3.3% | |
| 2 | Satisfied | 45 | 8.8% | |
| 3 | Not very satisfied | 27 | 5.3% | |
| 4 | Not satisfied at all | 10 | 2.0% | |
| 99 | Skipped | 410 | 80.5% | |
| Frequency : | 509 | 100% | ||
21. Are you satisfied with the overall performance of Jason Hu as city mayor over the last four years?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 1 | Very satisfied | 4 | 0.8% | |
| 2 | Satisfied | 17 | 3.3% | |
| 3 | Not very satisfied | 23 | 4.5% | |
| 4 | Not satisfied at all | 5 | 1.0% | |
| 99 | Skipped | 460 | 90.4% | |
| Frequency : | 509 | 100% | ||
22. Are you satisfied with the overall performance of Lai, Ching-Te as city mayor over the last four years?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 1 | Very satisfied | 15 | 2.9% | |
| 2 | Satisfied | 28 | 5.5% | |
| 3 | Not very satisfied | 9 | 1.8% | |
| 4 | Not satisfied at all | 2 | 0.4% | |
| 99 | Skipped | 455 | 89.4% | |
| Frequency : | 509 | 100% | ||
