:::
Classification Questionnaire :
1. PJ1 What has been the most important issue to you personally in this election?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
1 | economic development problem | 311 | 25.1% | |
2 | cross-Strait direct link | 19 | 1.5% | |
3 | problem about unification and independence | 6 | 0.5% | |
4 | national identification | 5 | 0.4% | |
5 | alternation of power | 6 | 0.5% | |
6 | political stability problem | 13 | 1.1% | |
7 | diplomacy or international status problem | 3 | 0.2% | |
8 | judicial reform problem | 0 | 0% | |
9 | educational reform problem | 15 | 1.2% | |
10 | environmental protection problem | 1 | 0.1% | |
11 | problem about the gap between the rich and the poor | 0 | 0% | |
12 | unemployment problem | 11 | 0.9% | |
13 | aborigines problem | 0 | 0% | |
14 | social welfare problem | 8 | 0.7% | |
15 | crime problem | 8 | 0.7% | |
16 | government administration | 3 | 0.2% | |
17 | candidate's personal morality | 8 | 0.7% | |
18 | candidate's ability | 5 | 0.4% | |
19 | national defense security problem | 1 | 0.1% | |
20 | grand china market | 0 | 0% | |
21 | people's livelihood question | 56 | 4.5% | |
22 | ethnic groups problems | 4 | 0.3% | |
23 | The State Affairs Fund Scandal | 1 | 0.1% | |
24 | democracy problems | 5 | 0.4% | |
25 | public infrastructure | 4 | 0.3% | |
26 | referendums | 0 | 0% | |
27 | cross-Strait relations | 41 | 3.3% | |
28 | keep Taiwan's sovereignty | 4 | 0.3% | |
29 | vote-buying problems | 1 | 0.1% | |
30 | fairness of election | 0 | 0% | |
31 | result of election | 8 | 0.7% | |
32 | bribery problem | 12 | 1.0% | |
33 | social stability problem | 3 | 0.2% | |
34 | government personnel | 0 | 0% | |
35 | MA Ying-jeou's「623 policy」 | 0 | 0% | |
36 | resuming (joining) the United Nations | 5 | 0.4% | |
37 | green card problems | 5 | 0.4% | |
38 | officer's salary | 0 | 0% | |
39 | country competency | 0 | 0% | |
40 | open up the cross-Strait sightseeing | 1 | 0.1% | |
41 | dictatorial leadership | 3 | 0.2% | |
42 | Taiwan future problem | 3 | 0.2% | |
43 | media chaos | 0 | 0% | |
44 | financial reform | 2 | 0.2% | |
45 | tax cuts | 1 | 0.1% | |
46 | denizen bride's right ensuring | 0 | 0% | |
47 | open up the mainland china's record of formal schooling | 1 | 0.1% | |
48 | illegal lobbying and corrupt practices by means of privilege | 0 | 0% | |
49 | fairness and justice | 1 | 0.1% | |
990 | omit | 0 | 0% | |
992 | no | 68 | 5.5% | |
995 | refuse to answer | 0 | 0% | |
998 | don't know | 103 | 8.3% | |
Sysmiss | 483 | 39.0% | ||
Frequency : | 1238 | 100% |
2. PJ2 What has been the second most important issue to you personally in this election?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
1 | economic development problem | 84 | 6.8% | |
2 | cross-Strait direct link | 7 | 0.6% | |
3 | problem about unification and independence | 6 | 0.5% | |
4 | national identification | 2 | 0.2% | |
5 | alternation of power | 3 | 0.2% | |
6 | political stability problem | 19 | 1.5% | |
7 | diplomacy or international status problem | 24 | 1.9% | |
8 | judicial reform problem | 3 | 0.2% | |
9 | educational reform problem | 46 | 3.7% | |
10 | environmental protection problem | 1 | 0.1% | |
11 | problem about the gap between the rich and the poor | 1 | 0.1% | |
12 | unemployment problem | 4 | 0.3% | |
13 | aborigines problem | 0 | 0% | |
14 | social welfare problem | 22 | 1.8% | |
15 | crime problem | 42 | 3.4% | |
16 | government administration | 4 | 0.3% | |
17 | candidate's personal morality | 3 | 0.2% | |
18 | candidate's ability | 3 | 0.2% | |
19 | national defense security problem | 3 | 0.2% | |
20 | grand china market | 1 | 0.1% | |
21 | people's livelihood question | 32 | 2.6% | |
22 | ethnic groups problems | 27 | 2.2% | |
23 | The State Affairs Fund Scandal | 0 | 0% | |
24 | democracy problems | 3 | 0.2% | |
25 | public infrastructure | 9 | 0.7% | |
26 | referendums | 0 | 0% | |
27 | cross-Strait relations | 48 | 3.9% | |
28 | keep Taiwan's sovereignty | 8 | 0.7% | |
29 | vote-buying problems | 0 | 0% | |
30 | fairness of election | 0 | 0% | |
31 | result of election | 0 | 0% | |
32 | bribery problem | 25 | 2.0% | |
33 | social stability problem | 20 | 1.6% | |
34 | government personnel | 1 | 0.1% | |
35 | MA Ying-jeou's「623 policy」 | 1 | 0.1% | |
36 | resuming (joining) the United Nations | 1 | 0.1% | |
37 | green card problems | 3 | 0.2% | |
38 | officer's salary | 1 | 0.1% | |
39 | country competency | 0 | 0% | |
40 | open up the cross-Strait sightseeing | 0 | 0% | |
41 | dictatorial leadership | 1 | 0.1% | |
42 | Taiwan future problem | 1 | 0.1% | |
43 | media chaos | 0 | 0% | |
44 | financial reform | 1 | 0.1% | |
45 | tax cuts | 2 | 0.2% | |
46 | denizen bride's right ensuring | 0 | 0% | |
47 | open up the mainland china's record of formal schooling | 0 | 0% | |
48 | illegal lobbying and corrupt practices by means of privilege | 0 | 0% | |
49 | fairness and justice | 0 | 0% | |
990 | omit | 0 | 0% | |
992 | no | 85 | 6.9% | |
995 | refuse to answer | 0 | 0% | |
998 | don't know | 37 | 3.0% | |
999 | skip | 171 | 13.8% | |
Sysmiss | 483 | 39.0% | ||
Frequency : | 1238 | 100% |
3. PJ3 What do you think is the most important political problem facing Taiwan today?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
101 | black-and-gold politics problem | 0 | 0% | |
102 | bribery problem | 2 | 0.2% | |
103 | illegal lobbying and corrupt practices by means of privilege | 0 | 0% | |
104 | problem about administrative degeneration and corruption | 30 | 2.4% | |
105 | military nationalization problem | 0 | 0% | |
106 | unfair judiciary or judicial reform problem | 0 | 0% | |
107 | political stability problem | 81 | 6.5% | |
108 | constitutional reform problem | 2 | 0.2% | |
109 | problem about 「black」 intervening politics | 0 | 0% | |
110 | incapability of government | 4 | 0.3% | |
111 | Ideological problem | 0 | 0% | |
112 | media chaos | 0 | 0% | |
113 | neutral administration | 0 | 0% | |
114 | government personnel | 0 | 0% | |
115 | election of justice | 3 | 0.2% | |
116 | political trust problem | 0 | 0% | |
117 | separation of power | 0 | 0% | |
118 | social justice | 0 | 0% | |
201 | cross-Strait problem | 86 | 7.0% | |
202 | problem about unification and independence or national ident | 30 | 2.4% | |
203 | cross-Strait direct link | 9 | 0.7% | |
204 | cross-Strait trade | 5 | 0.4% | |
301 | Taiwan future problem | 2 | 0.2% | |
302 | diplomacy or international status problem | 39 | 3.1% | |
303 | problem about resuming the United Nations | 7 | 0.6% | |
304 | problem about China's military assaulting Taiwan | 2 | 0.2% | |
305 | national defense security problem | 4 | 0.3% | |
401 | traffic problem | 0 | 0% | |
402 | problem about houses or price of houses | 0 | 0% | |
403 | public order problem | 11 | 0.9% | |
404 | social welfare problem | 3 | 0.2% | |
405 | medical insurance problem | 0 | 0% | |
406 | social morality problem | 0 | 0% | |
407 | problem about the labor and capital | 0 | 0% | |
408 | aborigines problem | 0 | 0% | |
409 | ethnic harmony problem | 50 | 4.0% | |
501 | economic development problem | 91 | 7.3% | |
502 | industry moving abroad problem | 0 | 0% | |
503 | problem about prices of commodities | 7 | 0.6% | |
504 | unemployment problem | 3 | 0.2% | |
505 | problem about stock market stability | 0 | 0% | |
506 | public infrastructure | 0 | 0% | |
507 | tax problem | 1 | 0.1% | |
508 | people's livelihood question | 13 | 1.1% | |
509 | country competency | 0 | 0% | |
510 | social stability problem | 6 | 0.5% | |
511 | an agricultural product import | 0 | 0% | |
512 | financial reform | 0 | 0% | |
601 | agricultural problem | 0 | 0% | |
602 | problem about the gap between the rich and the poor | 0 | 0% | |
603 | educational reform problem | 2 | 0.2% | |
604 | recreation problem | 0 | 0% | |
605 | environmental protection problem | 0 | 0% | |
701 | mayoral special expense fund | 0 | 0% | |
702 | state fund embezzlement scandal of CHEN Shui-bian | 2 | 0.2% | |
703 | democracy stability | 1 | 0.1% | |
704 | candidate's ability | 0 | 0% | |
705 | candidate's personal morality | 7 | 0.6% | |
706 | dictatorial leadership | 6 | 0.5% | |
707 | alternation of power | 3 | 0.2% | |
990 | omit | 0 | 0% | |
992 | no | 48 | 3.9% | |
995 | refuse to answer | 5 | 0.4% | |
998 | don't know | 190 | 15.3% | |
999 | skip | 0 | 0% | |
Sysmiss | 483 | 39.0% | ||
Frequency : | 1238 | 100% |
4. PJ3A Which presidential candidate do you think is best in dealing with it?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
1 | Frank HSIEH and SU Tseng-chang | 87 | 7.0% | |
2 | MA Ying-jeou and Vincent SIEW | 271 | 21.9% | |
90 | omit | 0 | 0% | |
92 | none of these | 112 | 9.0% | |
95 | refuse to answer | 2 | 0.2% | |
97 | no opinion | 15 | 1.2% | |
98 | don't know | 25 | 2.0% | |
99 | skip | 243 | 19.6% | |
Sysmiss | 483 | 39.0% | ||
Frequency : | 1238 | 100% |
5. PJ4 What do you think is the second most important political problem facing Taiwan today?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
101 | black-and-gold politics problem | 0 | 0% | |
102 | bribery problem | 0 | 0% | |
103 | illegal lobbying and corrupt practices by means of privilege | 2 | 0.2% | |
104 | problem about administrative degeneration and corruption | 12 | 1.0% | |
105 | military nationalization problem | 0 | 0% | |
106 | unfair judiciary or judicial reform problem | 1 | 0.1% | |
107 | political stability problem | 31 | 2.5% | |
108 | constitutional reform problem | 5 | 0.4% | |
109 | problem about 「black」 intervening politics | 1 | 0.1% | |
110 | incapability of government | 6 | 0.5% | |
111 | Ideological problem | 2 | 0.2% | |
112 | media chaos | 2 | 0.2% | |
113 | neutral administration | 0 | 0% | |
114 | government personnel | 4 | 0.3% | |
115 | election of justice | 0 | 0% | |
116 | political trust problem | 1 | 0.1% | |
117 | separation of power | 1 | 0.1% | |
118 | social justice | 0 | 0% | |
201 | cross-Strait problem | 40 | 3.2% | |
202 | problem about unification and independence or national ident | 8 | 0.7% | |
203 | cross-Strait direct link | 3 | 0.2% | |
204 | cross-Strait trade | 1 | 0.1% | |
301 | Taiwan future problem | 3 | 0.2% | |
302 | diplomacy or international status problem | 41 | 3.3% | |
303 | problem about resuming the United Nations | 4 | 0.3% | |
304 | problem about China's military assaulting Taiwan | 0 | 0% | |
305 | national defense security problem | 3 | 0.2% | |
401 | traffic problem | 1 | 0.1% | |
402 | problem about houses or price of houses | 1 | 0.1% | |
403 | public order problem | 15 | 1.2% | |
404 | social welfare problem | 8 | 0.7% | |
405 | medical insurance problem | 1 | 0.1% | |
406 | social morality problem | 0 | 0% | |
407 | problem about the labor and capital | 0 | 0% | |
408 | aborigines problem | 0 | 0% | |
409 | ethnic harmony problem | 15 | 1.2% | |
501 | economic development problem | 70 | 5.7% | |
502 | industry moving abroad problem | 1 | 0.1% | |
503 | problem about prices of commodities | 5 | 0.4% | |
504 | unemployment problem | 2 | 0.2% | |
505 | problem about stock market stability | 0 | 0% | |
506 | public infrastructure | 7 | 0.6% | |
507 | tax problem | 1 | 0.1% | |
508 | people's livelihood question | 6 | 0.5% | |
509 | country competency | 2 | 0.2% | |
510 | social stability problem | 3 | 0.2% | |
511 | an agricultural product import | 0 | 0% | |
512 | financial reform | 0 | 0% | |
601 | agricultural problem | 0 | 0% | |
602 | problem about the gap between the rich and the poor | 0 | 0% | |
603 | educational reform problem | 18 | 1.5% | |
604 | recreation problem | 0 | 0% | |
605 | environmental protection problem | 2 | 0.2% | |
701 | mayoral special expense fund | 0 | 0% | |
702 | state fund embezzlement scandal of CHEN Shui-bian | 0 | 0% | |
703 | democracy stability | 2 | 0.2% | |
704 | candidate's ability | 1 | 0.1% | |
705 | candidate's personal morality | 5 | 0.4% | |
706 | dictatorial leadership | 2 | 0.2% | |
707 | alternation of power | 0 | 0% | |
990 | omit | 0 | 0% | |
992 | no | 88 | 7.1% | |
995 | refuse to answer | 3 | 0.2% | |
998 | don't know | 82 | 6.6% | |
999 | skip | 243 | 19.6% | |
Sysmiss | 483 | 39.0% | ||
Frequency : | 1238 | 100% |
6. PJ4A Which presidential candidate do you think is best in dealing with it?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
1 | Frank HSIEH and SU Tseng-chang | 60 | 4.9% | |
2 | MA Ying-jeou and Vincent SIEW | 193 | 15.6% | |
90 | omit | 0 | 0% | |
92 | none of these | 62 | 5.0% | |
95 | refuse to answer | 1 | 0.1% | |
97 | no opinion | 8 | 0.7% | |
98 | don't know | 15 | 1.2% | |
99 | skip | 416 | 33.6% | |
Sysmiss | 483 | 39.0% | ||
Frequency : | 1238 | 100% |
7. PJ5A How would you rate Frank HSIEH using 0 to 10 scale?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
0 | his capability is very poor | 19 | 1.5% | |
1 | 7 | 0.6% | ||
2 | 19 | 1.5% | ||
3 | 60 | 4.9% | ||
4 | 54 | 4.4% | ||
5 | 174 | 14.1% | ||
6 | 112 | 9.0% | ||
7 | 102 | 8.2% | ||
8 | 96 | 7.8% | ||
9 | 22 | 1.8% | ||
10 | his capability is very good | 30 | 2.4% | |
90 | omit | 0 | 0% | |
95 | refuse to answer | 2 | 0.2% | |
96 | it's hard to say | 11 | 0.9% | |
97 | no opinion | 11 | 0.9% | |
98 | don't know | 36 | 2.9% | |
Sysmiss | 483 | 39.0% | ||
Frequency : | 1238 | 100% |
8. PJ5B How would you rate MA Ying-jeou?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
0 | his capability is very poor | 29 | 2.3% | |
1 | 9 | 0.7% | ||
2 | 22 | 1.8% | ||
3 | 41 | 3.3% | ||
4 | 48 | 3.9% | ||
5 | 139 | 11.2% | ||
6 | 110 | 8.9% | ||
7 | 118 | 9.5% | ||
8 | 114 | 9.2% | ||
9 | 38 | 3.1% | ||
10 | his capability is very good | 27 | 2.2% | |
90 | omit | 0 | 0% | |
95 | refuse to answer | 2 | 0.2% | |
96 | it's hard to say | 16 | 1.3% | |
97 | no opinion | 9 | 0.7% | |
98 | don't know | 33 | 2.7% | |
Sysmiss | 483 | 39.0% | ||
Frequency : | 1238 | 100% |
9. PJ6A We'd like to get your feeling toward presidential candidates. I'll read the name of a candidate and I'd like you to rate that candidate using a 0 to 10 scale, while rating 0 mean that you dislike him very much and rating 10 mean that you like h
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
0 | you dislike him very much | 54 | 4.4% | |
1 | 22 | 1.8% | ||
2 | 25 | 2.0% | ||
3 | 82 | 6.6% | ||
4 | 50 | 4.0% | ||
5 | 175 | 14.1% | ||
6 | 95 | 7.7% | ||
7 | 72 | 5.8% | ||
8 | 75 | 6.1% | ||
9 | 23 | 1.9% | ||
10 | you like him very much | 32 | 2.6% | |
90 | omit | 0 | 0% | |
95 | refuse to answer | 4 | 0.3% | |
96 | it's hard to say | 7 | 0.6% | |
97 | no opinion | 13 | 1.1% | |
98 | don't know | 26 | 2.1% | |
Sysmiss | 483 | 39.0% | ||
Frequency : | 1238 | 100% |
10. PJ6B How would you rate SU Tseng-chang?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
0 | you dislike him very much | 18 | 1.5% | |
1 | 14 | 1.1% | ||
2 | 29 | 2.3% | ||
3 | 51 | 4.1% | ||
4 | 65 | 5.2% | ||
5 | 182 | 14.7% | ||
6 | 82 | 6.6% | ||
7 | 120 | 9.7% | ||
8 | 86 | 7.0% | ||
9 | 29 | 2.3% | ||
10 | you like him very much | 27 | 2.2% | |
90 | omit | 0 | 0% | |
95 | refuse to answer | 3 | 0.2% | |
96 | it's hard to say | 9 | 0.7% | |
97 | no opinion | 12 | 1.0% | |
98 | don't know | 28 | 2.3% | |
Sysmiss | 483 | 39.0% | ||
Frequency : | 1238 | 100% |
11. PJ6C How would you rate MA Ying-jeou?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
0 | you dislike him very much | 34 | 2.8% | |
1 | 15 | 1.2% | ||
2 | 23 | 1.9% | ||
3 | 33 | 2.7% | ||
4 | 36 | 2.9% | ||
5 | 141 | 11.4% | ||
6 | 104 | 8.4% | ||
7 | 104 | 8.4% | ||
8 | 118 | 9.5% | ||
9 | 59 | 4.8% | ||
10 | you like him very much | 45 | 3.6% | |
90 | omit | 0 | 0% | |
95 | refuse to answer | 4 | 0.3% | |
96 | it's hard to say | 9 | 0.7% | |
97 | no opinion | 8 | 0.7% | |
98 | don't know | 22 | 1.8% | |
Sysmiss | 483 | 39.0% | ||
Frequency : | 1238 | 100% |
12. PJ6D How would you rate Vincent SIEW?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
0 | you dislike him very much | 37 | 3.0% | |
1 | 20 | 1.6% | ||
2 | 28 | 2.3% | ||
3 | 34 | 2.8% | ||
4 | 51 | 4.1% | ||
5 | 172 | 13.9% | ||
6 | 111 | 9.0% | ||
7 | 92 | 7.4% | ||
8 | 99 | 8.0% | ||
9 | 35 | 2.8% | ||
10 | you like him very much | 25 | 2.0% | |
90 | omit | 0 | 0% | |
95 | refuse to answer | 4 | 0.3% | |
96 | it's hard to say | 9 | 0.7% | |
97 | no opinion | 11 | 0.9% | |
98 | don't know | 27 | 2.2% | |
Sysmiss | 483 | 39.0% | ||
Frequency : | 1238 | 100% |