:::
Inquiry :  
TEDS Table of Project lists > TEDS2009M > The Survey of Taoyuan County Magistrate Elections in 2009 (Independence)
Classification Questionnaire :
Politics and Media
Local Political Knowledge
Social Context and Electoral Involvement
Political Efficacy
Political Trust
Voting Participation and Electoral Process
Relationship between County Government and Council
Political Knowledge
Local Governs
Electoral Issues
Government Performance and Economic Evaluation
Taiwanese, Chinese Identification
Position on Unification and Independence
Party Identification
Candidate's Image and Ability
Personal Data
Weight
1. Q01A Which candidate do you think had the most ability?
Values Categories n percentage
1 Wu, Fu-tong 3 0.2%
2 Jheng, Wun-can 328 24.5%
3 Wu, Jhih-yang 633 47.3%
90 omit 0 0%
91 all 21 1.6%
92 neither 28 2.1%
95 refuse to answer 8 0.6%
96 it's depended 10 0.8%
97 none opinion 26 1.9%
98 don't know 280 20.9%
Frequency : 1337 100%
2. Q01B Which one best understood the people’s needs?
Values Categories n percentage
1 Wu, Fu-tong 13 1.0%
2 Jheng, Wun-can 438 32.8%
3 Wu, Jhih-yang 465 34.8%
90 omit 0 0%
91 all 19 1.4%
92 neither 51 3.8%
95 refuse to answer 5 0.4%
96 it's depended 5 0.4%
97 none opinion 28 2.1%
98 don't know 313 23.4%
Frequency : 1337 100%
3. Q01C Which one was the most honest and incorruptible?
Values Categories n percentage
1 Wu, Fu-tong 26 1.9%
2 Jheng, Wun-can 291 21.8%
3 Wu, Jhih-yang 421 31.5%
90 omit 0 0%
91 all 45 3.4%
92 neither 56 4.2%
95 refuse to answer 11 0.8%
96 it's depended 16 1.2%
97 none opinion 37 2.8%
98 don't know 434 32.5%
Frequency : 1337 100%
4. Q01D Which one was the most trustworthy?
Values Categories n percentage
1 Wu, Fu-tong 11 0.8%
2 Jheng, Wun-can 321 24.0%
3 Wu, Jhih-yang 585 43.8%
90 omit 0 0%
91 all 19 1.4%
92 neither 59 4.4%
95 refuse to answer 11 0.8%
96 it's depended 9 0.7%
97 none opinion 36 2.7%
98 don't know 286 21.4%
Frequency : 1337 100%
5. Q01E Which one was the most enthusiastic about serving the people?
Values Categories n percentage
1 Wu, Fu-tong 14 1.1%
2 Jheng, Wun-can 275 20.6%
3 Wu, Jhih-yang 498 37.2%
90 omit 0 0%
91 all 40 3.0%
92 neither 37 2.8%
95 refuse to answer 9 0.7%
96 it's depended 12 0.9%
97 none opinion 31 2.3%
98 don't know 421 31.5%
Frequency : 1337 100%
6. Q02A We would like to know your feelings towards some political figures on a scale from 0-10. If you feel very favorable towards this person, you can give him the highest score of 10; if you feel hostile towards this person you can give him a 0 (zero
Values Categories n percentage
0 36 2.7%
1 22 1.7%
2 35 2.6%
3 75 5.6%
4 84 6.3%
5 532 39.8%
6 130 9.7%
7 104 7.8%
8 77 5.8%
9 18 1.4%
10 33 2.5%
90 omit 0 0%
95 refuse to answer 10 0.8%
96 it's hard to say 7 0.5%
97 none opinion 15 1.1%
98 don't know 159 11.9%
Frequency : 1337 100%
7. Q02B What's your feeling toward Wu, Jhih-yang?
Values Categories n percentage
0 40 3.0%
1 16 1.2%
2 36 2.7%
3 53 4.0%
4 74 5.5%
5 442 33.1%
6 202 15.1%
7 169 12.6%
8 114 8.5%
9 30 2.2%
10 43 3.2%
90 omit 0 0%
95 refuse to answer 7 0.5%
96 it's hard to say 8 0.6%
97 none opinion 14 1.1%
98 don't know 89 6.7%
Frequency : 1337 100%
8. Q03A What's your feeling toward Chen, Shui-bian?
Values Categories n percentage
0 487 36.4%
1 101 7.5%
2 106 7.9%
3 136 10.2%
4 84 6.3%
5 244 18.2%
6 44 3.3%
7 20 1.5%
8 23 1.7%
9 11 0.8%
10 18 1.4%
90 omit 0 0%
95 refuse to answer 11 0.8%
96 it's hard to say 4 0.3%
97 none opinion 8 0.6%
98 don't know 40 3.0%
Frequency : 1337 100%
9. Q03B What's your feeling toward Ma, Ying-jeou?
Values Categories n percentage
0 103 7.7%
1 55 4.1%
2 71 5.3%
3 116 8.7%
4 78 5.8%
5 384 28.7%
6 163 12.2%
7 134 10.0%
8 115 8.6%
9 20 1.5%
10 43 3.2%
90 omit 0 0%
95 refuse to answer 7 0.5%
96 it's hard to say 3 0.2%
97 none opinion 8 0.6%
98 don't know 37 2.8%
Frequency : 1337 100%
10. Q03C How about Tsai, Ing-wen?
Values Categories n percentage
0 59 4.4%
1 42 3.1%
2 53 4.0%
3 81 6.1%
4 101 7.5%
5 445 33.3%
6 176 13.2%
7 105 7.8%
8 91 6.8%
9 35 2.6%
10 37 2.8%
90 omit 0 0%
95 refuse to answer 9 0.7%
96 it's hard to say 2 0.1%
97 none opinion 11 0.8%
98 don't know 90 6.7%
Frequency : 1337 100%
11. Q03D How about Wu, Dun-Yi?
Values Categories n percentage
0 79 5.9%
1 35 2.6%
2 62 4.6%
3 95 7.1%
4 111 8.3%
5 457 34.2%
6 174 13.0%
7 109 8.2%
8 71 5.3%
9 16 1.2%
10 21 1.6%
90 omit 0 0%
95 refuse to answer 8 0.6%
96 it's hard to say 1 0.1%
97 none opinion 16 1.2%
98 don't know 82 6.1%
Frequency : 1337 100%
12. Q03E How about Su, Tseng-chang?
Values Categories n percentage
0 51 3.8%
1 27 2.0%
2 45 3.4%
3 77 5.8%
4 95 7.1%
5 389 29.1%
6 205 15.3%
7 150 11.2%
8 103 7.7%
9 45 3.4%
10 51 3.8%
90 omit 0 0%
95 refuse to answer 9 0.7%
96 it's hard to say 1 0.1%
97 none opinion 17 1.3%
98 don't know 72 5.4%
Frequency : 1337 100%
13. Q03F How about Frank Hsieh?
Values Categories n percentage
0 126 9.4%
1 44 3.3%
2 110 8.2%
3 153 11.4%
4 141 10.5%
5 334 25.0%
6 134 10.0%
7 100 7.5%
8 56 4.2%
9 20 1.5%
10 30 2.2%
90 omit 0 0%
95 refuse to answer 9 0.7%
96 it's hard to say 2 0.1%
97 none opinion 16 1.2%
98 don't know 62 4.6%
Frequency : 1337 100%
14. Q03G How about Wang, Jin-pyng?
Values Categories n percentage
0 34 2.5%
1 17 1.3%
2 50 3.7%
3 80 6.0%
4 90 6.7%
5 498 37.2%
6 181 13.5%
7 156 11.7%
8 97 7.3%
9 18 1.4%
10 29 2.2%
90 omit 0 0%
95 refuse to answer 9 0.7%
96 it's hard to say 0 0%
97 none opinion 14 1.1%
98 don't know 64 4.8%
Frequency : 1337 100%
15. Q03H How about Jhu, Li-Lun?
Values Categories n percentage
0 41 3.1%
1 8 0.6%
2 39 2.9%
3 41 3.1%
4 66 4.9%
5 354 26.5%
6 200 15.0%
7 206 15.4%
8 188 14.1%
9 51 3.8%
10 79 5.9%
90 omit 0 0%
95 refuse to answer 11 0.8%
96 it's hard to say 1 0.1%
97 none opinion 7 0.5%
98 don't know 45 3.4%
Frequency : 1337 100%
Go Top
cron web_use_log