:::
TEDS Table of Project lists >
TEDS2009M >
The Survey of Yunlin County Magistrate Elections in 2009 (Independent)
Classification Questionnaire :
1. Q01A Which candidate do you think had the most ability?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
1 | Su, Jhih-fen | 862 | 64.0% | |
2 | Wu, Wei-jhih | 96 | 7.1% | |
90 | omit | 0 | 0% | |
91 | all | 25 | 1.9% | |
92 | neither | 29 | 2.1% | |
95 | refuse to answer | 9 | 0.7% | |
96 | it's depended | 31 | 2.3% | |
97 | none opinion | 35 | 2.6% | |
98 | don't know | 259 | 19.2% | |
Frequency : | 1346 | 100% |
2. Q01B Which one best understood the people's needs?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
1 | Su, Jhih-fen | 869 | 64.6% | |
2 | Wu, Wei-jhih | 72 | 5.3% | |
90 | omit | 0 | 0% | |
91 | all | 21 | 1.6% | |
92 | neither | 53 | 3.9% | |
95 | refuse to answer | 7 | 0.5% | |
96 | it's depended | 24 | 1.8% | |
97 | none opinion | 28 | 2.1% | |
98 | don't know | 272 | 20.2% | |
Frequency : | 1346 | 100% |
3. Q01C Which one was the most honest and incorruptible?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
1 | Su, Jhih-fen | 448 | 33.3% | |
2 | Wu, Wei-jhih | 210 | 15.6% | |
90 | omit | 0 | 0% | |
91 | all | 46 | 3.4% | |
92 | neither | 88 | 6.5% | |
95 | refuse to answer | 13 | 1.0% | |
96 | it's depended | 27 | 2.0% | |
97 | none opinion | 36 | 2.7% | |
98 | don't know | 478 | 35.5% | |
Frequency : | 1346 | 100% |
4. Q01D Which one was the most trustworthy?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
1 | Su, Jhih-fen | 662 | 49.2% | |
2 | Wu, Wei-jhih | 176 | 13.1% | |
90 | omit | 1 | 0.1% | |
91 | all | 31 | 2.3% | |
92 | neither | 103 | 7.6% | |
95 | refuse to answer | 9 | 0.7% | |
96 | it's depended | 35 | 2.6% | |
97 | none opinion | 34 | 2.5% | |
98 | don't know | 295 | 21.9% | |
Frequency : | 1346 | 100% |
5. Q01E Which one was the most enthusiastic about serving the people?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
1 | Su, Jhih-fen | 756 | 56.2% | |
2 | Wu, Wei-jhih | 74 | 5.5% | |
90 | omit | 0 | 0% | |
91 | all | 48 | 3.6% | |
92 | neither | 43 | 3.2% | |
95 | refuse to answer | 8 | 0.6% | |
96 | it's depended | 28 | 2.1% | |
97 | none opinion | 39 | 2.9% | |
98 | don't know | 350 | 26.0% | |
Frequency : | 1346 | 100% |
6. Q02A We would like to know your feelings towards some political figures on a scale from 0-10. If you feel very favorable towards this person, you can give him the highest score of 10; if you feel hostile towards this person you can give him a 0 (zero
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
0 | 20 | 1.5% | ||
1 | 4 | 0.3% | ||
2 | 22 | 1.6% | ||
3 | 33 | 2.5% | ||
4 | 31 | 2.3% | ||
5 | 404 | 30.0% | ||
6 | 175 | 13.0% | ||
7 | 161 | 12.0% | ||
8 | 173 | 12.8% | ||
9 | 39 | 2.9% | ||
10 | 156 | 11.6% | ||
90 | omit | 0 | 0% | |
95 | refuse to answer | 20 | 1.5% | |
96 | it's depended | 6 | 0.4% | |
97 | none opinion | 10 | 0.7% | |
98 | don't know | 92 | 6.8% | |
Frequency : | 1346 | 100% |
7. Q02B What's your feeling toward Wu, Wei-jhih?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
0 | 114 | 8.5% | ||
1 | 26 | 1.9% | ||
2 | 70 | 5.2% | ||
3 | 87 | 6.5% | ||
4 | 77 | 5.7% | ||
5 | 423 | 31.4% | ||
6 | 77 | 5.7% | ||
7 | 34 | 2.5% | ||
8 | 27 | 2.0% | ||
9 | 6 | 0.4% | ||
10 | 20 | 1.5% | ||
90 | omit | 0 | 0% | |
95 | refuse to answer | 22 | 1.6% | |
96 | it's depended | 22 | 1.6% | |
97 | none opinion | 23 | 1.7% | |
98 | don't know | 318 | 23.6% | |
Frequency : | 1346 | 100% |
8. Q03A What's your feeling toward Chen, Shui-bian?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
0 | 355 | 26.4% | ||
1 | 60 | 4.5% | ||
2 | 88 | 6.5% | ||
3 | 104 | 7.7% | ||
4 | 74 | 5.5% | ||
5 | 251 | 18.6% | ||
6 | 57 | 4.2% | ||
7 | 44 | 3.3% | ||
8 | 43 | 3.2% | ||
9 | 10 | 0.7% | ||
10 | 89 | 6.6% | ||
90 | omit | 0 | 0% | |
95 | refuse to answer | 29 | 2.1% | |
96 | it's depended | 22 | 1.6% | |
97 | none opinion | 17 | 1.3% | |
98 | don't know | 103 | 7.6% | |
Frequency : | 1346 | 100% |
9. Q03B What's your feeling toward Ma, Ying-jeou?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
0 | 183 | 13.6% | ||
1 | 47 | 3.5% | ||
2 | 96 | 7.1% | ||
3 | 105 | 7.8% | ||
4 | 103 | 7.6% | ||
5 | 388 | 28.8% | ||
6 | 99 | 7.4% | ||
7 | 72 | 5.3% | ||
8 | 50 | 3.7% | ||
9 | 20 | 1.5% | ||
10 | 41 | 3.0% | ||
90 | omit | 0 | 0% | |
95 | refuse to answer | 23 | 1.7% | |
96 | it's depended | 6 | 0.4% | |
97 | none opinion | 15 | 1.1% | |
98 | don't know | 98 | 7.3% | |
Frequency : | 1346 | 100% |
10. Q03C How about Tsai, Ing-wen?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
0 | 53 | 3.9% | ||
1 | 32 | 2.4% | ||
2 | 35 | 2.6% | ||
3 | 71 | 5.3% | ||
4 | 59 | 4.4% | ||
5 | 376 | 27.9% | ||
6 | 150 | 11.1% | ||
7 | 99 | 7.4% | ||
8 | 103 | 7.6% | ||
9 | 20 | 1.5% | ||
10 | 88 | 6.5% | ||
90 | omit | 0 | 0% | |
95 | refuse to answer | 22 | 1.6% | |
96 | it's depended | 10 | 0.7% | |
97 | none opinion | 17 | 1.3% | |
98 | don't know | 211 | 15.7% | |
Frequency : | 1346 | 100% |
11. Q03D How about Wu, Dun-Yi?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
0 | 147 | 10.9% | ||
1 | 43 | 3.2% | ||
2 | 64 | 4.8% | ||
3 | 113 | 8.4% | ||
4 | 102 | 7.6% | ||
5 | 384 | 28.5% | ||
6 | 102 | 7.6% | ||
7 | 54 | 4.0% | ||
8 | 41 | 3.0% | ||
9 | 11 | 0.8% | ||
10 | 22 | 1.6% | ||
90 | omit | 0 | 0% | |
95 | refuse to answer | 24 | 1.8% | |
96 | it's depended | 8 | 0.6% | |
97 | none opinion | 13 | 1.0% | |
98 | don't know | 218 | 16.2% | |
Frequency : | 1346 | 100% |
12. Q03E How about Su, Tseng-chang?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
0 | 37 | 2.8% | ||
1 | 19 | 1.4% | ||
2 | 46 | 3.4% | ||
3 | 66 | 4.9% | ||
4 | 50 | 3.7% | ||
5 | 349 | 25.9% | ||
6 | 163 | 12.1% | ||
7 | 130 | 9.7% | ||
8 | 122 | 9.1% | ||
9 | 44 | 3.3% | ||
10 | 106 | 7.9% | ||
90 | omit | 0 | 0% | |
95 | refuse to answer | 26 | 1.9% | |
96 | it's depended | 3 | 0.2% | |
97 | none opinion | 14 | 1.0% | |
98 | don't know | 171 | 12.7% | |
Frequency : | 1346 | 100% |
13. Q03F How about Frank Hsieh?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
0 | 95 | 7.1% | ||
1 | 37 | 2.8% | ||
2 | 64 | 4.8% | ||
3 | 95 | 7.1% | ||
4 | 85 | 6.3% | ||
5 | 358 | 26.6% | ||
6 | 137 | 10.2% | ||
7 | 89 | 6.6% | ||
8 | 80 | 5.9% | ||
9 | 26 | 1.9% | ||
10 | 69 | 5.1% | ||
90 | omit | 0 | 0% | |
95 | refuse to answer | 25 | 1.9% | |
96 | it's depended | 5 | 0.4% | |
97 | none opinion | 19 | 1.4% | |
98 | don't know | 162 | 12.0% | |
Frequency : | 1346 | 100% |
14. Q03G How about Wang, Jin-pyng?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
0 | 62 | 4.6% | ||
1 | 20 | 1.5% | ||
2 | 46 | 3.4% | ||
3 | 72 | 5.3% | ||
4 | 63 | 4.7% | ||
5 | 448 | 33.3% | ||
6 | 142 | 10.5% | ||
7 | 99 | 7.4% | ||
8 | 79 | 5.9% | ||
9 | 23 | 1.7% | ||
10 | 47 | 3.5% | ||
90 | omit | 0 | 0% | |
95 | refuse to answer | 24 | 1.8% | |
96 | it's depended | 12 | 0.9% | |
97 | none opinion | 20 | 1.5% | |
98 | don't know | 189 | 14.0% | |
Frequency : | 1346 | 100% |
15. Q03H How about Jhu, Li-Lun?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
0 | 58 | 4.3% | ||
1 | 16 | 1.2% | ||
2 | 46 | 3.4% | ||
3 | 69 | 5.1% | ||
4 | 55 | 4.1% | ||
5 | 316 | 23.5% | ||
6 | 111 | 8.2% | ||
7 | 103 | 7.6% | ||
8 | 69 | 5.1% | ||
9 | 21 | 1.6% | ||
10 | 28 | 2.1% | ||
90 | omit | 0 | 0% | |
95 | refuse to answer | 26 | 1.9% | |
96 | it's depended | 11 | 0.8% | |
97 | none opinion | 23 | 1.7% | |
98 | don't know | 394 | 29.3% | |
Frequency : | 1346 | 100% |