:::
Inquiry :  
TEDS Table of Project lists > TEDS2009M > The Survey of Yunlin County Magistrate Elections in 2009 (Independent)
Classification Questionnaire :
Politics and Media
Local Political Knowledge
Social Context and Electoral Involvement
Political Efficacy
Political Trust
Voting Participation and Electoral Process
Relationship between County Government and Council
Political Knowledge
Local Governs
Electoral Issues
Government Performance and Economic Evaluation
Taiwanese, Chinese Identification
Position on Unification and Independence
Party Identification
Candidate's Image and Ability
Personal Data
Weight
1. Q01A Which candidate do you think had the most ability?
Values Categories n percentage
1 Su, Jhih-fen 862 64.0%
2 Wu, Wei-jhih 96 7.1%
90 omit 0 0%
91 all 25 1.9%
92 neither 29 2.1%
95 refuse to answer 9 0.7%
96 it's depended 31 2.3%
97 none opinion 35 2.6%
98 don't know 259 19.2%
Frequency : 1346 100%
2. Q01B Which one best understood the people's needs?
Values Categories n percentage
1 Su, Jhih-fen 869 64.6%
2 Wu, Wei-jhih 72 5.3%
90 omit 0 0%
91 all 21 1.6%
92 neither 53 3.9%
95 refuse to answer 7 0.5%
96 it's depended 24 1.8%
97 none opinion 28 2.1%
98 don't know 272 20.2%
Frequency : 1346 100%
3. Q01C Which one was the most honest and incorruptible?
Values Categories n percentage
1 Su, Jhih-fen 448 33.3%
2 Wu, Wei-jhih 210 15.6%
90 omit 0 0%
91 all 46 3.4%
92 neither 88 6.5%
95 refuse to answer 13 1.0%
96 it's depended 27 2.0%
97 none opinion 36 2.7%
98 don't know 478 35.5%
Frequency : 1346 100%
4. Q01D Which one was the most trustworthy?
Values Categories n percentage
1 Su, Jhih-fen 662 49.2%
2 Wu, Wei-jhih 176 13.1%
90 omit 1 0.1%
91 all 31 2.3%
92 neither 103 7.6%
95 refuse to answer 9 0.7%
96 it's depended 35 2.6%
97 none opinion 34 2.5%
98 don't know 295 21.9%
Frequency : 1346 100%
5. Q01E Which one was the most enthusiastic about serving the people?
Values Categories n percentage
1 Su, Jhih-fen 756 56.2%
2 Wu, Wei-jhih 74 5.5%
90 omit 0 0%
91 all 48 3.6%
92 neither 43 3.2%
95 refuse to answer 8 0.6%
96 it's depended 28 2.1%
97 none opinion 39 2.9%
98 don't know 350 26.0%
Frequency : 1346 100%
6. Q02A We would like to know your feelings towards some political figures on a scale from 0-10. If you feel very favorable towards this person, you can give him the highest score of 10; if you feel hostile towards this person you can give him a 0 (zero
Values Categories n percentage
0 20 1.5%
1 4 0.3%
2 22 1.6%
3 33 2.5%
4 31 2.3%
5 404 30.0%
6 175 13.0%
7 161 12.0%
8 173 12.8%
9 39 2.9%
10 156 11.6%
90 omit 0 0%
95 refuse to answer 20 1.5%
96 it's depended 6 0.4%
97 none opinion 10 0.7%
98 don't know 92 6.8%
Frequency : 1346 100%
7. Q02B What's your feeling toward Wu, Wei-jhih?
Values Categories n percentage
0 114 8.5%
1 26 1.9%
2 70 5.2%
3 87 6.5%
4 77 5.7%
5 423 31.4%
6 77 5.7%
7 34 2.5%
8 27 2.0%
9 6 0.4%
10 20 1.5%
90 omit 0 0%
95 refuse to answer 22 1.6%
96 it's depended 22 1.6%
97 none opinion 23 1.7%
98 don't know 318 23.6%
Frequency : 1346 100%
8. Q03A What's your feeling toward Chen, Shui-bian?
Values Categories n percentage
0 355 26.4%
1 60 4.5%
2 88 6.5%
3 104 7.7%
4 74 5.5%
5 251 18.6%
6 57 4.2%
7 44 3.3%
8 43 3.2%
9 10 0.7%
10 89 6.6%
90 omit 0 0%
95 refuse to answer 29 2.1%
96 it's depended 22 1.6%
97 none opinion 17 1.3%
98 don't know 103 7.6%
Frequency : 1346 100%
9. Q03B What's your feeling toward Ma, Ying-jeou?
Values Categories n percentage
0 183 13.6%
1 47 3.5%
2 96 7.1%
3 105 7.8%
4 103 7.6%
5 388 28.8%
6 99 7.4%
7 72 5.3%
8 50 3.7%
9 20 1.5%
10 41 3.0%
90 omit 0 0%
95 refuse to answer 23 1.7%
96 it's depended 6 0.4%
97 none opinion 15 1.1%
98 don't know 98 7.3%
Frequency : 1346 100%
10. Q03C How about Tsai, Ing-wen?
Values Categories n percentage
0 53 3.9%
1 32 2.4%
2 35 2.6%
3 71 5.3%
4 59 4.4%
5 376 27.9%
6 150 11.1%
7 99 7.4%
8 103 7.6%
9 20 1.5%
10 88 6.5%
90 omit 0 0%
95 refuse to answer 22 1.6%
96 it's depended 10 0.7%
97 none opinion 17 1.3%
98 don't know 211 15.7%
Frequency : 1346 100%
11. Q03D How about Wu, Dun-Yi?
Values Categories n percentage
0 147 10.9%
1 43 3.2%
2 64 4.8%
3 113 8.4%
4 102 7.6%
5 384 28.5%
6 102 7.6%
7 54 4.0%
8 41 3.0%
9 11 0.8%
10 22 1.6%
90 omit 0 0%
95 refuse to answer 24 1.8%
96 it's depended 8 0.6%
97 none opinion 13 1.0%
98 don't know 218 16.2%
Frequency : 1346 100%
12. Q03E How about Su, Tseng-chang?
Values Categories n percentage
0 37 2.8%
1 19 1.4%
2 46 3.4%
3 66 4.9%
4 50 3.7%
5 349 25.9%
6 163 12.1%
7 130 9.7%
8 122 9.1%
9 44 3.3%
10 106 7.9%
90 omit 0 0%
95 refuse to answer 26 1.9%
96 it's depended 3 0.2%
97 none opinion 14 1.0%
98 don't know 171 12.7%
Frequency : 1346 100%
13. Q03F How about Frank Hsieh?
Values Categories n percentage
0 95 7.1%
1 37 2.8%
2 64 4.8%
3 95 7.1%
4 85 6.3%
5 358 26.6%
6 137 10.2%
7 89 6.6%
8 80 5.9%
9 26 1.9%
10 69 5.1%
90 omit 0 0%
95 refuse to answer 25 1.9%
96 it's depended 5 0.4%
97 none opinion 19 1.4%
98 don't know 162 12.0%
Frequency : 1346 100%
14. Q03G How about Wang, Jin-pyng?
Values Categories n percentage
0 62 4.6%
1 20 1.5%
2 46 3.4%
3 72 5.3%
4 63 4.7%
5 448 33.3%
6 142 10.5%
7 99 7.4%
8 79 5.9%
9 23 1.7%
10 47 3.5%
90 omit 0 0%
95 refuse to answer 24 1.8%
96 it's depended 12 0.9%
97 none opinion 20 1.5%
98 don't know 189 14.0%
Frequency : 1346 100%
15. Q03H How about Jhu, Li-Lun?
Values Categories n percentage
0 58 4.3%
1 16 1.2%
2 46 3.4%
3 69 5.1%
4 55 4.1%
5 316 23.5%
6 111 8.2%
7 103 7.6%
8 69 5.1%
9 21 1.6%
10 28 2.1%
90 omit 0 0%
95 refuse to answer 26 1.9%
96 it's depended 11 0.8%
97 none opinion 23 1.7%
98 don't know 394 29.3%
Frequency : 1346 100%
Go Top
cron web_use_log