:::
TEDS Table of Project lists >
TEDS2005M >
The Survey of Taichung County Magistrate/City Mayoral Elections in 2005 (Independence)
1. E01 In last year's election many people went to vote, while others, for various reasons, did not go to vote. Did you vote?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 1 | yes | 475 | 77.9% | |
| 2 | no | 129 | 21.1% | |
| 90 | omit | 0 | 0% | |
| 91 | forgot | 4 | 0.7% | |
| 95 | refuse to answer | 2 | 0.3% | |
| Frequency : | 610 | 100% | ||
2. E1A What was the reason you didn't vote?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 1 | leave home town | 18 | 2.9% | |
| 2 | lack ideal candidate | 18 | 2.9% | |
| 3 | difficult to choose | 3 | 0.5% | |
| 4 | voting for anyone has no difference | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 5 | working | 21 | 3.4% | |
| 6 | have no time | 16 | 2.6% | |
| 7 | can't change the electoral outcome | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 8 | don't want to vote(have no interest) | 27 | 4.4% | |
| 9 | don't vote for the legislator but vote for the county magistrar | 0 | 0% | |
| 10 | forgot to vote | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 11 | the census register is in the municipality directly under the jurisdiction of th Central Govenment | 2 | 0.3% | |
| 12 | have no confidence in the country | 2 | 0.3% | |
| 13 | have no voting right | 0 | 0% | |
| 14 | identification card(stamp, voting notification) is disappeared | 0 | 0% | |
| 15 | staff of voting affairs | 3 | 0.5% | |
| 16 | military service | 2 | 0.3% | |
| 17 | get ill(mental factors) | 4 | 0.7% | |
| 18 | fearful of bribery | 0 | 0% | |
| 19 | the election is unimportant and meaningless | 0 | 0% | |
| 20 | disappointed about politics | 4 | 0.7% | |
| 21 | the weather is too cold | 0 | 0% | |
| 22 | don't understand the candidates' qualities | 0 | 0% | |
| 23 | re-registering for residence didn't live up to six months | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 24 | don't understand the election | 0 | 0% | |
| 25 | war of words | 2 | 0.3% | |
| 26 | never voted before | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 27 | oversleep | 0 | 0% | |
| 28 | serve a sentence | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 29 | illiteracy | 0 | 0% | |
| 30 | marriage | 0 | 0% | |
| 90 | omit | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 95 | refuse to answer | 0 | 0% | |
| 99 | skip | 481 | 78.8% | |
| Frequency : | 610 | 100% | ||
3. E2A Which candidate did you vote for in Taichung City Mayor Election?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 1 | Li,Guei-Fu | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 2 | Shen,Jhih-Huei | 7 | 1.1% | |
| 3 | Lin,Jia-Long | 122 | 20.0% | |
| 4 | Hu,Jhih-Ciang | 256 | 42.0% | |
| 90 | omit | 0 | 0% | |
| 91 | forgot | 17 | 2.8% | |
| 92 | invalid vote | 2 | 0.3% | |
| 95 | refuse to answer | 69 | 11.3% | |
| 98 | don't know | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 99 | skip | 135 | 22.1% | |
| Frequency : | 610 | 100% | ||
4. E2B Which party did you vote for?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 1 | KMT | 6 | 1.0% | |
| 2 | DPP | 7 | 1.1% | |
| 3 | PFP | 0 | 0% | |
| 4 | Independents | 0 | 0% | |
| 90 | omit | 0 | 0% | |
| 91 | forgot | 13 | 2.1% | |
| 95 | refuse to answer | 59 | 9.7% | |
| 98 | don't know | 2 | 0.3% | |
| 99 | skip | 523 | 85.7% | |
| Frequency : | 610 | 100% | ||
5. E2C What was the main reason you voted for this candidate?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 1 | honest with integrity | 12 | 2.0% | |
| 2 | capable of governing | 15 | 2.5% | |
| 3 | prefer to pan-blue | 2 | 0.3% | |
| 4 | better than any other candidates | 22 | 3.6% | |
| 5 | don't vote for DPP(oppose DPP) | 8 | 1.3% | |
| 6 | identify with PFP | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 7 | try a change of hands(discontent with the incumbent) | 27 | 4.4% | |
| 8 | industrious to interrogate the administarion | 0 | 0% | |
| 9 | have good achievements in his/her official career | 8 | 1.3% | |
| 10 | have good policy statement | 12 | 2.0% | |
| 11 | have contribution to the local area(strive for local construction) | 7 | 1.1% | |
| 12 | have experience | 3 | 0.5% | |
| 13 | like him/her(have a good impression on him/her) | 21 | 3.4% | |
| 14 | identify with DPP | 8 | 1.3% | |
| 15 | dare to do and say | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 16 | have good performances(former term) | 56 | 9.2% | |
| 17 | someone(or the candidate) came to persuade to vote for some candidate | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 18 | in order for stability | 0 | 0% | |
| 19 | don't like other candidates | 4 | 0.7% | |
| 20 | care for people | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 21 | have no burden of party | 0 | 0% | |
| 22 | he/she is nice | 4 | 0.7% | |
| 23 | geographical relations(native, neighbor) | 2 | 0.3% | |
| 24 | have abilities | 13 | 2.1% | |
| 25 | have contribution to Taiwan | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 26 | hometown association(other assocation) supports some candidate | 0 | 0% | |
| 27 | 009 and 014 | 0 | 0% | |
| 28 | popularity | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 29 | friends recommend | 5 | 0.8% | |
| 30 | family members support or influence | 11 | 1.8% | |
| 31 | his/her image is straight | 4 | 0.7% | |
| 32 | support him/her | 6 | 1.0% | |
| 33 | the administrative efficacy is good | 0 | 0% | |
| 34 | promote Taiwan's localization | 0 | 0% | |
| 35 | rational and moderate | 0 | 0% | |
| 36 | more familiar with him/her | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 37 | his/her image is nice | 19 | 3.1% | |
| 38 | do things neutrally | 0 | 0% | |
| 39 | identify with NP | 0 | 0% | |
| 40 | appreciate Lee Teng-hui | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 41 | she is a woman representative | 2 | 0.3% | |
| 42 | charisma | 2 | 0.3% | |
| 43 | the head of a neighborhood of 25 families(or the head of a basic community unit) solicited voe | 0 | 0% | |
| 44 | enthusiastic | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 45 | pay attention to a disadvantaged minority | 0 | 0% | |
| 46 | concern the local people's opinions | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 47 | sympathetic vote | 2 | 0.3% | |
| 48 | work hard and more responsible | 0 | 0% | |
| 49 | identify with KMT | 11 | 1.8% | |
| 50 | his/her educational background is high | 0 | 0% | |
| 51 | the candidate is the respondent's friend(acquaint with the candidate) | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 52 | Taiwan people | 0 | 0% | |
| 53 | benefit the economy | 0 | 0% | |
| 54 | done what he/she said | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 55 | just want to vote for him/her | 5 | 0.8% | |
| 56 | strive for electors' welfare | 2 | 0.3% | |
| 57 | propaganda | 0 | 0% | |
| 58 | promote justice | 0 | 0% | |
| 59 | identify with some party | 30 | 4.9% | |
| 60 | implement his/her policies | 0 | 0% | |
| 61 | demand of work | 0 | 0% | |
| 62 | young | 13 | 2.1% | |
| 63 | the candidate is the respondent's relative(family member) | 0 | 0% | |
| 64 | famous | 2 | 0.3% | |
| 65 | support the incumbent | 5 | 0.8% | |
| 66 | allocative vote | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 67 | the candidate is a scholar | 0 | 0% | |
| 68 | have actual strength | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 69 | served many terms | 0 | 0% | |
| 70 | the candidate's elder family members had achievement in the local area | 0 | 0% | |
| 71 | 001 and 008 | 0 | 0% | |
| 72 | be good at manipulating politics | 0 | 0% | |
| 73 | 010 and 037 | 0 | 0% | |
| 74 | work out cross-strait relation | 0 | 0% | |
| 75 | identify with TSU | 0 | 0% | |
| 76 | need his/her professional abilities | 0 | 0% | |
| 77 | vigorous | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 78 | reform | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 79 | change KMT's old styles | 0 | 0% | |
| 80 | eloquence | 0 | 0% | |
| 81 | have good heath | 0 | 0% | |
| 82 | support the candidate of the same surname | 0 | 0% | |
| 83 | active | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 84 | served well | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 85 | the incumbent has no achievement | 4 | 0.7% | |
| 86 | vote of discharged military members | 0 | 0% | |
| 87 | the candidate is the respondent's chief | 0 | 0% | |
| 88 | the ruling party has plenty of resource | 0 | 0% | |
| 89 | give another party a chance(the turnover of the ruling party) | 2 | 0.3% | |
| 90 | give new candidate a chance | 0 | 0% | |
| 91 | personal integrity | 3 | 0.5% | |
| 92 | the candidate is cultural worker(or educative worker) | 0 | 0% | |
| 93 | relation of interest | 0 | 0% | |
| 94 | agree with his/her political idea | 4 | 0.7% | |
| 95 | do things according to principles | 0 | 0% | |
| 96 | have his/her own ideas | 0 | 0% | |
| 97 | give him/her a try again | 4 | 0.7% | |
| 98 | 037 and 050 | 0 | 0% | |
| 99 | the candidate is self-confident | 0 | 0% | |
| 101 | take care of his/her own people | 0 | 0% | |
| 103 | vote randomly | 3 | 0.5% | |
| 105 | honesty | 0 | 0% | |
| 106 | read the official election notice | 0 | 0% | |
| 107 | served the village head for a long time in the local area | 0 | 0% | |
| 109 | support Taiwan independence | 0 | 0% | |
| 110 | 014 and 041 | 0 | 0% | |
| 111 | care for laborers more | 0 | 0% | |
| 112 | check and balance between parties | 0 | 0% | |
| 114 | faction | 0 | 0% | |
| 115 | check and balance between parties | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 116 | suitable | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 117 | take care of peasants | 0 | 0% | |
| 118 | dependable | 0 | 0% | |
| 120 | give him/her a chance | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 121 | the candidate did the elector a favor | 0 | 0% | |
| 122 | both the candidate's educational background and experience are nice | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 125 | young and capable of doing things | 3 | 0.5% | |
| 126 | the respondent is a party member of KMT | 3 | 0.5% | |
| 127 | identify with Taiwan | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 128 | the respondent's husband is a party member of KMT | 0 | 0% | |
| 131 | capable of protecting people | 0 | 0% | |
| 136 | handsome and cute(good looks) | 0 | 0% | |
| 137 | religious factors | 0 | 0% | |
| 138 | his/her foreground is good | 4 | 0.7% | |
| 139 | support president | 0 | 0% | |
| 140 | improve the chaos of the congress (meeting) | 0 | 0% | |
| 141 | take care of women's rights and interests | 0 | 0% | |
| 142 | think that the candidate fails to be elected, taking urgent steps to vote for him/her | 0 | 0% | |
| 143 | don't belong to any party or faction | 0 | 0% | |
| 144 | dislike KMT | 2 | 0.3% | |
| 145 | have good performance in the previous official position | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 146 | Ma Ying-jeou resign the chairman of KMT | 0 | 0% | |
| 147 | take care of the aged | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 148 | the competitor made a personal attack | 4 | 0.7% | |
| 149 | have a international viewpoint | 4 | 0.7% | |
| 150 | there are some problems with the candidate's health | 2 | 0.3% | |
| 151 | strategic voting | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 152 | sincereness | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 153 | appreciate the candidate's wife(or members of family) | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 154 | feel disappointed with the government of DPP | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 155 | other candidates bought ballots or were involved in corruption | 0 | 0% | |
| 156 | vote for the candidate who fails to be elected | 0 | 0% | |
| 157 | the candidate's elder does badly | 0 | 0% | |
| 158 | do well in Kaohsiung City | 0 | 0% | |
| 159 | have the willpower | 0 | 0% | |
| 160 | background of farming family | 0 | 0% | |
| 990 | omit | 6 | 1.0% | |
| 995 | refuse to answer | 29 | 4.8% | |
| 998 | don't know | 24 | 3.9% | |
| 999 | skip | 137 | 22.5% | |
| Frequency : | 610 | 100% | ||
6. E3A Which candidate did you vote for in Taichung City councilor Election?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 101 | He-Zih-Hua | 0 | 0% | |
| 102 | Siao,Jie | 4 | 0.7% | |
| 103 | Jhang,Hong-Nian | 12 | 2.0% | |
| 104 | Huang,Ying-Jie | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 105 | Lin,Cing-Hua | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 106 | Huang,Guo-Shu | 6 | 1.0% | |
| 107 | Peng,Wun-He | 3 | 0.5% | |
| 108 | Jiang,Jheng-Ji | 3 | 0.5% | |
| 109 | Liao,Mei-Yan | 0 | 0% | |
| 110 | Chen,Jhen-Syun | 2 | 0.3% | |
| 111 | Hong,Jia-Hong | 7 | 1.1% | |
| 112 | Jhuang,Nai-Huei | 3 | 0.5% | |
| 201 | Yan,Jhih-Siou | 5 | 0.8% | |
| 202 | Lai,Jia-Wei | 3 | 0.5% | |
| 203 | Lai,Yu-Syong | 6 | 1.0% | |
| 204 | Chen,Tian-Wun | 9 | 1.5% | |
| 205 | Liang,Cheng | 2 | 0.3% | |
| 206 | Hu,Mu-Yuan | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 207 | Fan,Song-Yu | 6 | 1.0% | |
| 208 | Ji,Li-Yu | 3 | 0.5% | |
| 209 | Liao,Pei-Chun | 2 | 0.3% | |
| 210 | Jhong,Jia-Leng | 4 | 0.7% | |
| 211 | Chen,You-Jiang | 8 | 1.3% | |
| 212 | Liou,Guo-Long | 3 | 0.5% | |
| 301 | Chen,Fu-Wun | 5 | 0.8% | |
| 302 | Lin,Pei-Han | 7 | 1.1% | |
| 303 | Lin,Wei-Bang | 6 | 1.0% | |
| 304 | Liao,Sing-Sheng | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 305 | Jheng,Gong-Jin | 2 | 0.3% | |
| 306 | Lin-Huang,Yu-Mei | 3 | 0.5% | |
| 307 | Lin,Shu-Rong | 3 | 0.5% | |
| 308 | Li,Jhong | 5 | 0.8% | |
| 309 | He,Min-Cheng | 12 | 2.0% | |
| 310 | Yan,Ying-Nan | 5 | 0.8% | |
| 311 | Syu,Huei-Jhu | 3 | 0.5% | |
| 312 | Lai,Yi-Nian | 7 | 1.1% | |
| 313 | Ciou,Su-Jhen | 2 | 0.3% | |
| 401 | Jhang-Liao,Wan-Jian | 7 | 1.1% | |
| 402 | Chen,Fu-De | 2 | 0.3% | |
| 403 | Liao,Song-Bo | 2 | 0.3% | |
| 404 | Jhang-Liao,Nai-Lun | 8 | 1.3% | |
| 405 | Lai,Heng-Yao | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 406 | Ceng,Mu-Chuan | 3 | 0.5% | |
| 407 | Yang,Jheng-Jhong | 7 | 1.1% | |
| 408 | Wu,Chun-Sia | 5 | 0.8% | |
| 409 | Chen,Shu-Hua | 9 | 1.5% | |
| 410 | Yan,Rong-Fa | 0 | 0% | |
| 411 | Jiang,Shao-Ji | 2 | 0.3% | |
| 412 | Huang,Sin-Huei | 7 | 1.1% | |
| 413 | Liou,Tian-Song | 0 | 0% | |
| 414 | Chen,Ruei-De | 3 | 0.5% | |
| 501 | He,Jheng-Ren | 5 | 0.8% | |
| 502 | Jhang,Yao-Jhong | 2 | 0.3% | |
| 503 | Jhang,Bo-Wei | 0 | 0% | |
| 504 | Chen,San-Jing | 5 | 0.8% | |
| 505 | Liou,Shih-Jhou | 4 | 0.7% | |
| 506 | He,Wun-Hai | 0 | 0% | |
| 507 | Wang,Ciou-Dong | 12 | 2.0% | |
| 508 | Huang,Shu-Fen | 4 | 0.7% | |
| 509 | Ding,Jhen-Jia | 3 | 0.5% | |
| 510 | Lin,Chuan | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 601 | Lin,Yan-Sian | 0 | 0% | |
| 602 | Liou,Chun-Cai | 2 | 0.3% | |
| 603 | Yang,Shan-Chih | 5 | 0.8% | |
| 604 | Cai,Ya-Ling | 7 | 1.1% | |
| 605 | Chen,Jian-Yong | 0 | 0% | |
| 606 | Lin,Shih-Jian | 3 | 0.5% | |
| 607 | Shen,You-Lian | 5 | 0.8% | |
| 608 | Chen,Cing-Jing | 5 | 0.8% | |
| 609 | Lai,Yuan-Shun | 8 | 1.3% | |
| 610 | Chen,Ruei-Chang | 4 | 0.7% | |
| 611 | Wei,Shih-Yu | 0 | 0% | |
| 612 | Wang,Yue-Bin | 2 | 0.3% | |
| 613 | Tang,Guo-Tai | 5 | 0.8% | |
| 614 | Chen,Cheng-Tian | 4 | 0.7% | |
| 615 | Ceng,Chao-Rong | 5 | 0.8% | |
| 616 | Sie,Li-Fang | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 617 | Lin,Yong-Neng | 4 | 0.7% | |
| 618 | You,Min-Jhe | 8 | 1.3% | |
| 619 | Jhang,Ming-Chang | 2 | 0.3% | |
| 620 | Jhang,Guei-Rong | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 701 | Huang,Ren | 0 | 0% | |
| 702 | Luo,Chun-Lan | 0 | 0% | |
| 703 | Chen,Tian-Sih | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 9990 | omit | 0 | 0% | |
| 9991 | forgot | 74 | 12.1% | |
| 9992 | invalid vote | 16 | 2.6% | |
| 9993 | the census register isn't here | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 9995 | refuse to answer | 60 | 9.8% | |
| 9998 | don't know | 5 | 0.8% | |
| 9999 | skip | 135 | 22.1% | |
| Frequency : | 610 | 100% | ||
7. E3B Which party did you vote for?
| Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
| 1 | KMT | 27 | 4.4% | |
| 2 | DPP | 20 | 3.3% | |
| 3 | NP | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 4 | PFP | 0 | 0% | |
| 5 | TAI | 0 | 0% | |
| 6 | TSU | 0 | 0% | |
| 7 | independents | 3 | 0.5% | |
| 8 | pan-blue | 0 | 0% | |
| 9 | pan-green | 0 | 0% | |
| 90 | omit | 0 | 0% | |
| 91 | forgot | 30 | 4.9% | |
| 95 | refuse to answer | 49 | 8.0% | |
| 98 | don't know | 10 | 1.6% | |
| 99 | skip | 470 | 77.0% | |
| Frequency : | 610 | 100% | ||
