:::
TEDS Table of Project lists >
TEDS2004L >
The Survey of Legislative Election in 2004 (B) (Independence)
Classification Questionnaire :
1. J1A First, do you think this legislative election helped to promote ethnic harmony, intensify ethnic conflict, or did it not have any influence in this area?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
1 | promoted ethnic harmony | 202 | 16.1% | |
2 | intensified ethnic conflict | 417 | 33.1% | |
3 | no influence in this area | 459 | 36.5% | |
90 | omit | 0 | 0% | |
95 | refuse to answer | 7 | 0.6% | |
96 | it's dependeded | 6 | 0.5% | |
97 | none opinion | 12 | 0.9% | |
98 | don't know | 155 | 12.3% | |
Frequency : | 1258 | 100% |
2. J1AA How large was the influence?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
1 | very strong influence | 255 | 20.3% | |
2 | some influence | 340 | 27.0% | |
90 | omit | 2 | 0.2% | |
95 | refuse to answer | 0 | 0% | |
96 | it's dependeded | 14 | 1.1% | |
97 | none opinion | 1 | 0.1% | |
98 | don't know | 7 | 0.6% | |
99 | skip | 639 | 50.8% | |
Frequency : | 1258 | 100% |
3. J2A Do you think this legislative election brought about a decrease or increase in the extent of money politics and organized crime (“black
gold”), or did it not have any influence in this area?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
1 | the extent of money politics and organized crime decreased | 361 | 28.7% | |
2 | the extent of money politics and organized crime increased | 292 | 23.2% | |
3 | no effect | 373 | 29.6% | |
90 | omit | 0 | 0% | |
95 | refuse to answer | 12 | 0.9% | |
96 | it's hard to say | 5 | 0.4% | |
97 | none opinion | 14 | 1.1% | |
98 | don't know | 201 | 16.0% | |
Frequency : | 1258 | 100% |
4. J2AA How large was the effect?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
1 | a large effect | 228 | 18.1% | |
2 | some effect | 397 | 31.6% | |
90 | omit | 2 | 0.2% | |
95 | refuse to answer | 0 | 0% | |
96 | it's dependeded | 13 | 1.0% | |
97 | none opinion | 1 | 0.1% | |
98 | don't know | 12 | 0.9% | |
99 | skip | 605 | 48.1% | |
Frequency : | 1258 | 100% |
5. J3A Do you think this legislative election strengthened the popular consciousness for Taiwan independence, strengthened the popular consciousness for Chinese unification, or did it not have any influence in this area?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
1 | strengthened Taiwan independence | 277 | 22.0% | |
2 | strengthened Chinese unification | 180 | 14.3% | |
3 | no influence in this area | 504 | 40.1% | |
4 | both were strengthened | 36 | 2.9% | |
90 | omit | 1 | 0.1% | |
95 | refuse to answer | 11 | 0.9% | |
96 | it's dependeded | 11 | 0.9% | |
97 | none opinion | 20 | 1.6% | |
98 | don't know | 218 | 17.3% | |
Frequency : | 1258 | 100% |
6. J3AA How large was the influence?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
1 | very strong influence | 132 | 10.5% | |
2 | some influence | 308 | 24.5% | |
90 | omit | 0 | 0% | |
95 | refuse to answer | 0 | 0% | |
96 | it's dependeded | 7 | 0.6% | |
97 | none opinion | 0 | 0% | |
98 | don't know | 10 | 0.8% | |
99 | skip | 801 | 63.7% | |
Frequency : | 1258 | 100% |
7. J4A Do you think this legislative election improved democracy in Taiwan, damaged democracy in Taiwan, or did it not have any influence in this area?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
1 | improved democracy | 488 | 38.8% | |
2 | damaged democracy | 239 | 19.0% | |
3 | no influence in this area | 336 | 26.7% | |
90 | omit | 1 | 0.1% | |
95 | refuse to answer | 2 | 0.2% | |
96 | it's dependeded | 10 | 0.8% | |
97 | none opinion | 14 | 1.1% | |
98 | don't know | 168 | 13.4% | |
Frequency : | 1258 | 100% |
8. J4AA How large was the influence?
Values Categories | n | percentage | ||
1 | very strong influence | 185 | 14.7% | |
2 | some influence | 506 | 40.2% | |
90 | omit | 5 | 0.4% | |
95 | refuse to answer | 1 | 0.1% | |
96 | it's dependeded | 15 | 1.2% | |
97 | none opinion | 3 | 0.2% | |
98 | don't know | 12 | 0.9% | |
99 | skip | 531 | 42.2% | |
Frequency : | 1258 | 100% |